Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 43.21C.040 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All branches of government of this state, including state agencies, municipal and public corporations, and counties shall review their present statutory authority, administrative regulations, and current policies and procedures for the purpose of determining whether there are any deficiencies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit full compliance with the purposes and provisions of this chapter and shall propose to the governor not later than January 1, 1972, such measures as may be necessary to bring their authority and policies in conformity with the intent, purposes, and procedures set forth in this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1973–1980 · leading case: Eastlake Cmty. Council v. Roanoke Assocs., Inc., 513 P.2d 36 (Wash. 1973).
Eastlake Cmty. Council v. Roanoke Assocs., Inc., 513 P.2d 36 (Wash. 1973). “RCW 43.21C.040. In addition, in this case, it is no answer to the application of SEPA, to claim the renewal of a building permit is a modest exercise in a long process.”
Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State High. Comm'n, 525 P.2d 774 (Wash. 1974). “In RCW 43.21C.040, all branches of state government are directed to examine their own statutory authority, regulations, policies and procedures to determine whether there are any deficiencies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit full compliance with the purposes and…”
State v. City of Seattle, 615 P.2d 461 (Wash. 1980). “SEPA further directs that the "laws of the state of Washington shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in this chapter" *169 (RCW 43.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.