Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 46.20.515 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The motorcycle endorsement examination must emphasize maneuvers necessary for on-street operation, including emergency braking and turning as may be required to avoid an impending collision.
(2) The examination for a two-wheeled motorcycle endorsement and the examination for a three-wheeled motorcycle endorsement must be separate and distinct examinations emphasizing the skills and maneuvers necessary to operate each type of motorcycle.
(3) The department may authorize an entity that has entered into a contract under RCW 46.20.520 to administer the motorcycle endorsement examination.
(4) The department may waive all or part of the examination for persons who satisfactorily complete the voluntary motorcycle operator training and education program authorized under RCW 46.20.520 or who satisfactorily complete a private motorcycle skills education course that has been certified by the department under RCW 46.81A.020.
[ 2011 c 370 s 5; 2003 c 41 s 3; 2002 c 197 s 1; 2001 c 104 s 2; 1999 c 274 s 11; 1982 c 77 s 4.]

Notes:

Intent2011 c 370: See note following RCW 28A.220.030.
Inclusion of stakeholder groups in communications to facilitate transition of driver licensing examination administration2011 c 370: See note following RCW 46.82.450.
Short titleEffective date2003 c 41: See notes following RCW 46.20.500.
Severability1982 c 77: See note following RCW 46.20.500.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: Kappelman v. Lutz, 170 P.3d 1189 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007).
Kappelman v. Lutz, 170 P.3d 1189 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “A motorcycle endorsement is not simply a "piece of paper." The motorcycle endorsement program under chapter 46.”
Kappelman v. Lutz, 141 Wash. App. 580 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “” The motorcycle endorsement program under chapter 46.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.