Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.320
Wages, remuneration
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) For the purpose of payment of contributions, "wages" means the remuneration paid by one employer during any calendar year to an individual in its employment under this title or the unemployment compensation law of any other state in the amount specified in RCW 50.24.010. If an employer (hereinafter referred to as a successor employer) during any calendar year acquires substantially all the operating assets of another employer (hereinafter referred to as a predecessor employer) or assets used in a separate unit of a trade or business of a predecessor employer, and immediately after the acquisition employs in the individual's trade or business an individual who immediately before the acquisition was employed in the trade or business of the predecessor employer, then, for the purposes of determining the amount of remuneration paid by the successor employer to the individual during the calendar year which is subject to contributions, any remuneration paid to the individual by the predecessor employer during that calendar year and before the acquisition shall be considered as having been paid by the successor employer.
(2) For the purpose of payment of benefits, "wages" means the remuneration paid by one or more employers to an individual for employment under this title during his or her base year: PROVIDED, That at the request of a claimant, wages may be calculated on the basis of remuneration payable. The department shall notify each claimant that wages are calculated on the basis of remuneration paid, but at the claimant's request a redetermination may be performed and based on remuneration payable.
(3) For the purpose of payment of benefits and payment of contributions, the term "wages" includes tips which are received after January 1, 1987, while performing services which constitute employment, and which are reported to the employer for federal income tax purposes.
(4)(a) "Remuneration" means all compensation paid for personal services including commissions and bonuses and the cash value of all compensation paid in any medium other than cash. The reasonable cash value of compensation paid in any medium other than cash and the reasonable value of gratuities shall be estimated and determined in accordance with rules prescribed by the commissioner. Remuneration does not include payments to members of a reserve component of the armed forces of the United States, including the organized militia of the state of Washington, for the performance of duty for periods not exceeding seventy-two hours at a time.
(b) Previously accrued compensation, other than severance pay or payments received pursuant to plant closure agreements, when assigned to a specific period of time by virtue of a collective bargaining agreement, individual employment contract, customary trade practice, or request of the individual compensated, shall be considered remuneration for the period to which it is assigned. Assignment clearly occurs when the compensation serves to make the individual eligible for all regular fringe benefits for the period to which the compensation is assigned.
(c) Settlements or other proceeds received by an individual as a result of a negotiated settlement for termination of an individual written employment contract prior to its expiration date shall be considered remuneration. The proceeds shall be deemed assigned in the same intervals and in the same amount for each interval as compensation was allocated under the contract.
(d) Except as provided in (c) of this subsection, the provisions of this subsection (4) pertaining to the assignment of previously accrued compensation shall not apply to individuals subject to RCW 50.44.050.
[ 2010 c 8 s 13006; 1998 c 162 s 1; 1995 c 296 s 1; 1986 c 21 s 1; 1984 c 134 s 2; 1983 1st ex.s. c 23 s 6; 1983 c 67 s 1; 1970 ex.s. c 2 s 3; 1953 ex.s. c 8 s 2; 1951 c 265 s 3; 1949 c 214 s 4; 1947 c 215 s 6; 1945 c 35 s 33; Rem. Supp. 1949 s 9998-171. Prior: 1943 c 127 s 13; 1941 c 253 s 14; 1939 c 214 s 16; 1937 c 162 s 19.]
Notes:
Conflict with federal requirements—1998 c 162: "If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state or the eligibility of employers in this state for federal unemployment tax credits, the conflicting part of this act is inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict, and the finding or determination does not affect the operation of the remainder of this act. Rules adopted under this act must meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state or the granting of federal unemployment tax credits to employers in this state." [ 1998 c 162 s 2.]
Effective date—1998 c 162: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and takes effect on the Sunday following the day that the governor signs this act [March 29, 1998] and is effective for initial claims filed on or after that Sunday." [ 1998 c 162 s 3.]
Severability—1995 c 296: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1995 c 296 s 5.]
Conflict with federal requirements—1995 c 296: "If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements that are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state or the eligibility of employers in this state for federal unemployment tax credits, the conflicting part of this act is hereby declared to be inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict, and such finding or determination shall not affect the operation of the remainder of this act. The rules under this act shall meet federal requirements that are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state or the granting of federal unemployment tax credits to employers in this state." [ 1995 c 296 s 6.]
Effective date—1995 c 296: "This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately [May 9, 1995]." [ 1995 c 296 s 7.]
Conflict with federal requirements—1986 c 21: "If any part of this act is found to be in conflict with federal requirements which are a prescribed condition to the allocation of federal funds to the state or the eligibility of employers in this state for federal unemployment tax credits, the conflicting part of this act is hereby declared to be inoperative solely to the extent of the conflict, and such finding or determination shall not affect the operation of the remainder of this act. The rules under this act shall meet federal requirements which are a necessary condition to the receipt of federal funds by the state or the granting of federal unemployment tax credits to employers in this state." [ 1986 c 21 s 2.]
Severability—1986 c 21: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1986 c 21 s 3.]
Conflict with federal requirements—Effective dates—Construction—1983 1st ex.s. c 23: See notes following RCW 50.04.073.
Effective date—1970 ex.s. c 2: See note following RCW 50.04.020.
Severability—1951 c 265: See note following RCW 50.98.070.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1954–2021 · leading case: Okamoto v. Employment Security Department
Okamoto v. Employment Security Department (2001)
“RCW 50.04.320(2) states that “[f]or the purpose of payment of benefits, ‘wages’ means the remuneration paid by one or more employers to an individual for employment.”
DeFelice v. Employment Security Department (2015)
“” RCW 50.04.320(4). The money collected from the dental practice’s patients was collected by Dr.”
In Re the Employees of Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. (1958)
“” •“ ‘Remuneration,’ ” according to RCW 50.04.320, “means all compensation paid for personal services, including commissions and bonuses and the cash value of all compensation paid in any medium other than cash.”
Okamoto v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT. (2001)
“Okamoto misinterprets the law in arguing that he "obtained work" and "earned wages" equal to five times his benefit amount, as required by the former Employment Security Act.”
Schneider v. Hutt (1976)
“Thus, the court held that the monetary portion of the arbitrator’s award resembled an award of damages due to the tortious act of another and that the award did not constitute remuneration within the meaning of RCW 50.04.320. The court also held that one of the policies of the…”
Language Connection, LLC v. Employment Security Department (2009)
“” RCW 50.04.320(1), (4)(a). Thus, the critical question is whether TLC is responsible for paying the interpreters compensation for their personal services.”
McIntyre v. Bates (1954)
“” RCW 50.04.320 ..." ‘Remuneration’ means all compensation paid for personal services, including commissions 5 Applying these statutes to the foregoing statement of facts, it is clear that respondents were employers, and that the salesmen under their contract performed personal…”
Miller v. Washington State Employment Security Department (1970)
“, During the period in question, RCW 50.04.320 provided: “For the purpose of payment of contributions, ‘wages’ means the first three thousand .”
In Re Miller (1970)
“" [2] During the period in question, RCW 50.04.320 provided: "For the purpose of payment of contributions, `wages' means the first three thousand dollars of remuneration paid by one employer during any calendar year to an individual in its employment under this title .”
Maria Sherry, V. Dept. Of Employment Security (2021)
“050(2)(b)(v), the definition of compensation set forth at RCW 50.04.320, and the relevant regulation, WAC 192- 150-115.”
Donais v. Department of Employment Security (1988)
“RCW 50.04.320 provides in part: "Remuneration" means all compensation paid for personal services including commissions and bonuses and the cash value of all compensation paid in any medium other than cash.”
Armand DeFelice v. State of Washington, Employment Security Dept. (2015)
“" RCW 50.04.320(1). '"Remuneration''' includes "all compensation paid for personal services.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.320(1) — 3 cases
Language Connection, LLC v. Employment Security Department (2009)
“” RCW 50.04.320(1), (4)(a). Thus, the critical question is whether TLC is responsible for paying the interpreters compensation for their personal services.”
Armand DeFelice v. State of Washington, Employment Security Dept. (2015)
“" RCW 50.04.320(1). '"Remuneration''' includes "all compensation paid for personal services.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.320(2) — 2 cases
Okamoto v. Employment Security Department (2001)
“RCW 50.04.320(2) states that “[f]or the purpose of payment of benefits, ‘wages’ means the remuneration paid by one or more employers to an individual for employment.”
Okamoto v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT. (2001)
“Okamoto misinterprets the law in arguing that he "obtained work" and "earned wages" equal to five times his benefit amount, as required by the former Employment Security Act.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.320(4) — 2 cases
DeFelice v. Employment Security Department (2015)
“” RCW 50.04.320(4). The money collected from the dental practice’s patients was collected by Dr.”
Armand DeFelice v. State of Washington, Employment Security Dept. (2015)
“" RCW 50.04.320(1). '"Remuneration''' includes "all compensation paid for personal services.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 50.04.320(4)(a) — 1 case
Maria Sherry, V. Dept. Of Employment Security (2021)
“050(2)(b)(v), the definition of compensation set forth at RCW 50.04.320, and the relevant regulation, WAC 192- 150-115.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.