Wash. Rev. Code » Title 58 · Chapter 58.17

Wash. Rev. Code § 58.17.090

Notice of public hearing

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Upon receipt of an application for preliminary plat approval the administrative officer charged by ordinance with responsibility for administration of regulations pertaining to platting and subdivisions shall provide public notice and set a date for a public hearing. Except as provided in RCW 36.70B.110, at a minimum, notice of the hearing shall be given in the following manner:
(a) Notice shall be published not less than ten days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the county and a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the real property which is proposed to be subdivided is located; and
(b) Special notice of the hearing shall be given to adjacent landowners by any other reasonable method local authorities deem necessary. Adjacent landowners are the owners of real property, as shown by the records of the county assessor, located within three hundred feet of any portion of the boundary of the proposed subdivision. If the owner of the real property which is proposed to be subdivided owns another parcel or parcels of real property which lie adjacent to the real property proposed to be subdivided, notice under this subsection (1)(b) shall be given to owners of real property located within three hundred feet of any portion of the boundaries of such adjacently located parcels of real property owned by the owner of the real property proposed to be subdivided.
(2) All hearings shall be public. All hearing notices shall include a description of the location of the proposed subdivision. The description may be in the form of either a vicinity location sketch or a written description other than a legal description.
[ 1995 c 347 s 426; 1981 c 293 s 5; 1974 ex.s. c 134 s 4; 1969 ex.s. c 271 s 9.]

Notes:

Finding—Severability—Part headings and table of contents not law—1995 c 347: See notes following RCW 36.70A.470.
Severability—1981 c 293: See note following RCW 58.17.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1982–2016 · leading case: South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n v. King County (1984) wash · cites it 6× “[3] Respondent's notice argument rests on the assertion that the notice provisions of RCW 58.17.090 are constitutionally inadequate.”
Crosby v. Spokane County (1999) wash · cites it 2× “180(2) conferred standing to seek review by way of a writ to “[a]ny property owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090.” RCW 58.17.090 requires special notice to “adjacent landowners” who are defined as “owners of real property .”
Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et ux (2016) washctapp “RCW 58.17.090(l)(b). We hold that easements omitted from a short plat are not, solely by their omission, extinguished.”
Crosby v. County of Spokane (1999) wash · cites it 3× “180(2) conferred standing to seek review by way of a writ to "[a]ny property owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090." RCW 58.17.090 requires special notice to "adjacent landowners" who are defined as "owners of real property .”
East Gig Harbor Improvement Association v. Pierce County (1986) wash · cites it 3× “Standing to bring the action is limited *711 to the following parties: (1) The applicant or owner of the property on which the subdivision is proposed; (2) Any property owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090; (3) Any property owner who deems himself aggrieved…”
Lejeune v. Clallam County (1992) washctapp · cites it 2× “Here, the neighbors were entitled to notice pursuant to RCW 58.17.090, they were given notice, they appeared, and they actively contested approval of the plat.”
Chelan County v. Nykreim (2002) wash “It limits standing to the applicant, the owner of the property on which the subdivision is proposed, any owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090, or any aggrieved property owner who will suffer direct or substantial impacts from the proposed short division.”
Chelan County v. Nykreim (2002) wash “It limits standing to the applicant, the owner of the property on which the subdivision is proposed, any owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090, or any aggrieved property owner who will suffer direct or substantial impacts from the proposed short division.”
Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc. (1990) washctapp “The court also found, however, that the City of Bellevue substantially complied with the notice provisions of RCW 58.17.090 (notice of public hearing for preliminary plat approval), and found that all owners or their predecessors received actual or constructive notice of the…”
Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish County (1982) washctapp “140, provided that the application for a preliminary plat shall be approved, disapproved or returned for modification or *282 correction within 90 days of filing unless the applicant consents to an extension.”
South Hollywood Hills Citizens Ass'n for Preservation of Neighborhood Safety & Environment v. King County (1982) washctapp · cites it 3× “Notice of a public hearing concerning Bristol View One was published in The Daily Journal-American on April 12, *172 1978. On April 21, approximately 2 weeks prior to the public hearing, notice was posted at three locations near the property.”
Kates v. City of Seattle (1986) washctapp “RCW 58.17.090; RCW 58.17.180. It follows that neighbors have a fundamental right to proper procedures in approving subdivisions.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 58.17.090(2) — 1 case
East Gig Harbor Improvement Association v. Pierce County (1986) wash “Standing to bring the action is limited *711 to the following parties: (1) The applicant or owner of the property on which the subdivision is proposed; (2) Any property owner entitled to special notice under RCW 58.17.090; (3) Any property owner who deems himself aggrieved…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 58.17.090(l)(b) — 1 case
Mark Hanna, et ux v. Allan Margitan, et ux (2016) washctapp “RCW 58.17.090(l)(b). We hold that easements omitted from a short plat are not, solely by their omission, extinguished.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.