Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 59.20.110 (2026)
Attorney's fees and costs
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In any action arising out of this chapter, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Holiday Resort Cmty. Ass'n v. Echo Lake Assocs., L.L.C., 135 P.3d 499 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006).
Holiday Resort Cmty. Ass'n v. Echo Lake Assocs., L.L.C., 135 P.3d 499 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “8 The court granted MHCW’s request for attorney fees under the MHLTA, RCW 59.20.110, and awarded MHCW $15,327. The tenants appeal and challenge the trial court’s decision to dismiss the CPA claim and its decision to award attorney fees to MHCW under the MHLTA.”
Seashore Villa Ass'n v. Hagglund Fam. Ltd. P'ship, 260 P.3d 906 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “Attorney Fees ¶28 The Park contends that the trial court erred in awarding the Association attorney fees under RCW 59.”
W. Plaza, LLC v. Tison, 364 P.3d 76 (Wash. 2015). “Further, we award Tison reasonable costs and attorney fees pursuant to RCW 59.20.110. I. Standard of Review ¶7 We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo.”
Country Manor MHC, LLC v. Occupant, 308 P.3d 818 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “Because the MHLTA requires a landlord to act reasonably and to enforce its rules fairly and in good faith, we affirm the trial court’s decision to hold an evidentiary hearing, remand for a partial award of fees to Country Manor under RCW 59.20.110, and deny each party’s request…”
Edna Allen v. Dan & Bills Rv Park, 428 P.3d 376 (Wash. Ct. App. 2018). “A reviewing court may reverse an administrative order if the order involves an error in interpreting or applying the law, the order is not supported by substantial evidence, or the order is arbitrary or capricious.”
Holiday Resort Cmty. Assoc. v. Echo Lake Assoc. LLC., 135 P.3d 499 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “The court ruled the 1997 Rental Agreement did not violate the MHLTA and there was no connection between the alleged CPA violation and the tenants' injuries.”
Hwang v. McMahill, 103 Wash. App. 945 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “16 Hwang is the prevailing party on appeal, and is entitled to attorney fees pursuant to the terms of the contract as well as RCW 59.20.110, subject to her compliance with RAP 18.”
Little Mountain Estates Tenants Ass'n v. Little Mountain Estates MHC, LLC, 192 P.3d 378 (Wash. Ct. App. 2008). “Attorney Fees ¶34 Both parties request an award of attorney fees based on RCW 59.20.110. RCW 59.20.110 provides, “In any action arising out of this chapter, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.”
McGahuey v. Hwang, 15 P.3d 672 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “1(a) and RCW 59.20.110, which states that “[i]n any action arising out of [the MHLTA], the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.”
Commonwealth Real Est. Servs. v. Padilla, 149 Wash. App. 757 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “1 and RCW 59.20.110. A party is entitled to attorney fees on appeal if a contract, statute, or recognized ground of equity permits recovery of attorney fees at trial and the party is the substantially prevailing party.”
Duvall Highlands, L.L.C. v. Elwell, 19 P.3d 1051 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “19 RCW 59.20.110 provides for attorney fees for the prevail *772 ing party “[i]n any action arising out of [the MHLTA].”
Duvall Highlands LLC v. Elwell, 19 P.3d 1051 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “[19] RCW 59.20.110 provides for attorney fees for the prevailing party "[i]n any action arising out of [the MHLTA].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.