Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 6.40A.090 (2026)
Savings clause
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter does not prevent the recognition under principles of comity or otherwise of a foreign-country judgment not within the scope of this chapter.
[ 2009 c 363 s 12.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Dille v. Toland, 329 P.3d 878 (Wash. 2014).
Dille v. Toland, 329 P.3d 878 (Wash. 2014). “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
Est. of Toland v. Toland, 286 P.3d 60 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “” RCW 6.40A.090. The statutory definition is, in part: *836 (5) “Party or “parties” means each of the following persons who has an interest in the subject of the particular proceeding and whose name and address are known to, or are reasonably ascertainable by, the petitioner:…”
In re Est. of Toland (Wash. 2014). “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
In re Est. of Toland (Wash. 2014). “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.