Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 6.40A.090 (2026)

Savings clause

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter does not prevent the recognition under principles of comity or otherwise of a foreign-country judgment not within the scope of this chapter.
[ 2009 c 363 s 12.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2012–2014 · leading case: Dille v. Toland, 329 P.3d 878 (Wash. 2014).
Dille v. Toland, 329 P.3d 878 (Wash. 2014). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
Est. of Toland v. Toland, 286 P.3d 60 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “” RCW 6.40A.090. The statutory definition is, in part: *836 (5) “Party or “parties” means each of the following persons who has an interest in the subject of the particular proceeding and whose name and address are known to, or are reasonably ascertainable by, the petitioner:…”
In re Est. of Toland (Wash. 2014). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
In re Est. of Toland (Wash. 2014). · cites it 3× “Pursuant to the savings clause in RCW 6.40A.090 and notwithstanding the scope of chapter 6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.