Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 64.32.030 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Each apartment, together with its undivided interest in the common areas and facilities shall not be considered as an intangible or a security or any interest therein but shall for all purposes constitute and be classified as real property.
[ 1963 c 156 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Shorewood West Condo. Ass'n v. Sadri, 966 P.2d 372 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
Shorewood West Condo. Ass'n v. Sadri, 966 P.2d 372 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “Grazul and Sadri cross appeal, arguing that the trial court erred: (1) in denying their motion for summary judgment that the Association did not have the authority to amend bylaws to restrict leasing; (2) in granting the Association’s motion for summary judgment that the lease…”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n, 142 Wash. App. 356 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 64.32.030, .040, .050(4). Further, common areas shall remain undivided and any covenant to the contrary is void.”
Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n, 174 P.3d 1224 (Wash. Ct. App. 2007). “RCW 64.32.030, .040, .050(4). Further, common areas shall remain undivided and any covenant to the contrary is void.”
Not Enough Trees, LLC v. Walter D. Davis & Judith K. David (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “Under RCW 64.32.050(5), [t]he necessary work of maintenance, repair and replacement of the common areas and facilities and the making of any addition or improvement thereto shall be carried out only as provided in [the HRPA] and in the bylaws.”
Shorewood West Condo Ass'n v. Sadri, 966 P.2d 372 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). “Grazul and Sadri cross appeal, arguing that the trial court erred: (1) in denying their motion for summary judgment that the Association did not have the authority to amend bylaws to restrict leasing; (2) in granting the Association's motion for summary judgment that the lease…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.