Wash. Rev. Code » Title 64 · Chapter 64.34
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 64.34.030 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as expressly provided in this chapter, provisions of this chapter may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this chapter may not be waived. A declarant may not act under a power of attorney or use any other device to evade the limitations or prohibitions of this chapter or the declaration.
[1989 c 43 s 1-104.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLC, 225 P.3d 213 (Wash. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLC, 225 P.3d 213 (Wash. 2009). · cites it 3× “RCW 64.34.030. ¶35 Given our determination that the FAA applies to the transactions in the cases before us, we conclude that the arbitration provision in each, including the terms providing for binding arbitration, are enforceable “like other contracts, in accordance with their…”
Marina Cove Condo. Owners Ass'n v. Isabella Estates, 34 P.3d 870 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “The Legislature’s choice of language, that the act “is enforceable by judicial proceeding” is definitive, and any argument that it should be interpreted as permissive is eclipsed by RCW 64.34.030, which states: Except as expressly provided in this chapter, provisions of this…”
Kruger Clinic Orthopaedics, LLC. v. Regence Blueshield, 138 P.3d 936 (Wash. 2006). “As the Marina Cove court went on to explain, "nothing in the language of RCW 64.34.030 and .100 prevents parties from mediating or otherwise settling their disputes in any manner they wish, including nonbinding arbitration," but the WCA preserved the parties' rights to enforce…”
Casey v. Sudden Valley Cmty. Ass'n, 329 P.3d 919 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” (discussing section 3-102 (“Powers of the Association”))); RCW 64.34.030 cmt. 3, in 2 Senate Journal at 2052 (same; discussing RCW 64.”
Bellevue Pac. Ctr. Ltd. P'ship v. Bellevue Pac. Tower Condo. Owners Ass'n, 287 P.3d 639 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 5× “8 RCW 64.34.030 ¶15 In its partial summary judgment order, the trial court relied on the 2003 release signed by Tower COA and LP as a bar to all of Tower COA’s claims.”
Ass'n v. Isabella Estates, 34 P.3d 870 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “The Legislature's choice of language, that the act "is enforceable by judicial proceeding" is definitive, and any argument that it should be interpreted as permissive is eclipsed by RCW 64.34.030, which states: Except as expressly provided in this chapter, provisions of this…”
Suzanne Parisien v. Eighty South Jackson Condo. Ass'n (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 3× “In turn, RCW 64.34.030 generally prohibits waiving the chapter’s provisions by agreement: Except as expressly provided in this chapter, provisions of this chapter may not be varied by agreement, and rights conferred by this chapter may not be waived.”
Sudden Valley Cmty. Ass'n, App v. Curt Casey, Dave Scott, Barbara Volkov, Resps (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “") (discussing Section 3-102 ("Powers of the Association")); Washington Condominium Act Official Comments to RCW 64.34.030 (same; discussing RCW 64.34.”
Kruger Clinic Orthopaedics, L.L.C. v. Regence BlueShield, 157 Wash. 2d 290 (Wash. 2006). “As the Marina Cove court went on to explain, “nothing in the language of RCW 64.34.030 and .100 prevents parties from mediating or otherwise settling their disputes in any manner they wish, including nonbinding arbitration,” but the WCA preserved the parties’ rights to enforce…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.