Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.150
Arbitration process
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The arbitrator may conduct the arbitration in such manner as the arbitrator considers appropriate so as to aid in the fair and expeditious disposition of the proceeding. The authority conferred upon the arbitrator includes the power to hold conferences with the parties to the arbitration proceeding before the hearing and to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality, and weight of any evidence.
(2) The arbitrator may decide a request for summary disposition of a claim or particular issue by agreement of all interested parties or upon request of one party to the arbitration proceeding if that party gives notice to all other parties to the arbitration proceeding and the other parties have a reasonable opportunity to respond.
(3) The arbitrator shall set a time and place for a hearing and give notice of the hearing not less than five days before the hearing. Unless a party to the arbitration proceeding interposes an objection to lack of or insufficiency of notice not later than the commencement of the hearing, the party's appearance at the hearing waives the objection. Upon request of a party to the arbitration proceeding and for good cause shown, or upon the arbitrator's own initiative, the arbitrator may adjourn the hearing from time to time as necessary but may not postpone the hearing to a time later than that fixed by the agreement to arbitrate for making the award unless the parties to the arbitration proceeding consent to a later date. The arbitrator may hear and decide the controversy upon the evidence produced although a party who was duly notified of the arbitration proceeding did not appear. The court, on request, may direct the arbitrator to promptly conduct the hearing and render a timely decision.
(4) If an arbitrator orders a hearing under subsection (3) of this section, the parties to the arbitration proceeding are entitled to be heard, to present evidence material to the controversy, and to cross-examine witnesses appearing at the hearing.
(5) If there is more than one arbitrator, all of them shall conduct the hearing under subsection (3) of this section; however, a majority shall decide any issue and make a final award.
(6) If an arbitrator ceases, or is unable, to act during the arbitration proceeding, a replacement arbitrator must be appointed in accordance with RCW 7.04A.110 to continue the hearing and to decide the controversy.
[ 2005 c 433 s 15.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Dan's Trucking, Inc. v. Kerr Contractors, Inc.
Dan's Trucking, Inc. v. Kerr Contractors, Inc. (2014)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2012)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Simeon J. Osborn & Monica Osborn, Resps v. Michael Callahan & Robin Callahan, Apps (2019)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
In Re The Marriage Of: Kathy Jo Rohrs, V. Joel Damon Rohrs (2024)
“RCW 7.04A.150 reads, in pertinent, part, as follows: (2) The arbitrator may decide a request for summary disposition of a claim or particular issue by agreement of all interested parties or upon request of one party to the arbitration proceeding if that party gives notice to all…”
David W. Newell v. Providence Health & Services (2019)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
In Re The Parenting & Support Of: B.a. (2017)
“y an arbitrator appointed as neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Marriage Of Curtis Glavin Nehring And Deborah Katherine Nehring (2020)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Karen M. Jones v. Perry Jay Jones, Iii (2014)
“70729-9-1/6 conducted the hearing contrary to RCW 7.04A.150, so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding.”
Marvin Olsen, Et Ux v. H. Gary Wallis, Et Ux (2017)
“230(1) states that the superior court shall vacate the arbitration award if one of six grounds are present: (a) the award was procured through corruption, fraud, or other undue means; (b) the arbitrator showed evident partiality or engaged in corruption or misconduct; (c) the…”
Magnadrive Corporation v. Magna Force, Inc. (2014)
“[a]n arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement, refused to consider evidence material to the controversy, or otherwise conducted the hearing contrary to RCW 7.04A.150, so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.150(1) — 2 cases
Simeon J. Osborn & Monica Osborn, Resps v. Michael Callahan & Robin Callahan, Apps (2019)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Karen M. Jones v. Perry Jay Jones, Iii (2014)
“70729-9-1/6 conducted the hearing contrary to RCW 7.04A.150, so as to prejudice substantially the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.150(2) — 1 case
In Re The Marriage Of: Kathy Jo Rohrs, V. Joel Damon Rohrs (2024)
“RCW 7.04A.150 reads, in pertinent, part, as follows: (2) The arbitrator may decide a request for summary disposition of a claim or particular issue by agreement of all interested parties or upon request of one party to the arbitration proceeding if that party gives notice to all…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.150(3) — 5 cases
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2012)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
In Re The Parenting & Support Of: B.a. (2017)
“y an arbitrator appointed as neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Simeon J. Osborn & Monica Osborn, Resps v. Michael Callahan & Robin Callahan, Apps (2019)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
David W. Newell v. Providence Health & Services (2019)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Marriage Of Curtis Glavin Nehring And Deborah Katherine Nehring (2020)
“an arbitrator appointed as a neutral; (ii) Corruption by an arbitrator; or (iii) Misconduct by an arbitrator prejudicing the rights of a party to the arbitration proceeding; (c) An arbitrator refused to postpone the hearing upon showing of sufficient cause for postponement,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.