Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.04A

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.220

Confirmation of award

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
After a party to the arbitration proceeding receives notice of an award, the party may file a motion with the court for an order confirming the award, at which time the court shall issue such an order unless the award is modified or corrected under RCW 7.04A.200 or 7.04A.240 or is vacated under RCW 7.04A.230.
[ 2005 c 433 s 22.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 36 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLC
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLC (2024) wash · cites it 13× “” RCW 7.04A.220 (emphasis added). Judicial scrutiny of an arbitration award is “strictly limited; courts will not review an arbitrator’s decision on the merits.”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2013) wash ““On application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under RCW 7.04A.220,7.04A.230, or 7.04A.240, the court may add.”
Verbeek Properties, LLC v. GreenCo Environmental, Inc. (2010) washctapp “RCW 7.04A.220. We therefore conclude a prayer for declaratory relief is not inconsistent with arbitration.”
Cummings v. Budget Tank Removal & Environmental Services, LLC (2011) washctapp “” RCW 7.04A.220 (emphasis added). In limited circumstances, when moved by a party, a trial court must grant a motion to modify or correct an award.”
Rimov v. Schultz (2011) washctapp · cites it 2× “See RCW 7.04A.220. Such confirmation would have ended this dispute short of the expense and *468 trouble of responding to this suit.”
Verbeek Properties v. Greenco Environ (2010) washctapp “RCW 7.04A.220. We therefore conclude a prayer for declaratory relief is not inconsistent with arbitration.”
Rimov v. Schultz (2011) washctapp · cites it 2× “See RCW 7.04A.220. Such confirmation would have *285 ended this dispute short of the expense and trouble of responding to this suit.”
Puget Sound Environmental Corp. v. Everett Shipyard, Inc. (2010) washctapp “RCW 7.04A.220. The court shall issue an order confirming the award unless the court modifies, corrects, or vacates the award under the limited circumstances set forth in RCW 7.”
Estate of Guido v. Exempla, Inc. (2012) coloctapp “11 (2011); Wash. Rev.Code §§ 7.04A.220, 7.04A.230, 7.”
Futureselect Portfolio Mgmt., Inc. v. Tremont Grp. Holdings, Inc. (2018) wash “See RCW 7.04A.220.... Plaintiffs' immediate appeal will not delay the adjudication of the remaining claims against KPMG, which may proceed to arbitration while Plaintiffs pursue their appeal.”
MBNA America Bank, NA v. Miles (2007) washctapp “250(3), “[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under RCW 7.04A.220 [confirmation of an arbitration award],.”
Marvin Olsen, Et Ux v. H. Gary Wallis, Et Ux (2017) washctapp · cites it 6× “Following an award, RCW 7.04A.220 allows either party to modify, correct, vacate, or confirm the award.”
Show all 36 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.