Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.04A

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.250

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Upon granting an order confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying, or correcting an award, the court shall enter a judgment in conformity with the order. The judgment may be recorded, docketed, and enforced as any other judgment in a civil action.
(2) A court may allow reasonable costs of the motion and subsequent judicial proceedings.
(3) On application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under RCW 7.04A.220, 7.04A.230, or 7.04A.240, the court may add to a judgment confirming, vacating without directing a rehearing, modifying, or correcting an award, attorneys' fees and other reasonable expenses of litigation incurred in a judicial proceeding after the award is made.
[ 2005 c 433 s 25.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44 cases (21 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc. (2019) washctapp · cites it 8× “We hold that the trial court abused its discretion when denying Mainline Rock’s application for fees because the trial court misread the law and failed to exercise its discretion under the statute. No.”
AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLC (2024) wash · cites it 4× “230 provide narrow grounds for modifying, correcting, or vacating an arbitrator’s award.”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2013) wash · cites it 3× “190(3) (FIPA attorney fees), 9 and RCW 7.04A.250(3) (arbitration act attorney fees).”
McGinnity v. AutoNation, Inc. (2009) washctapp · cites it 4× “030 and RCW 7.04A.250(3). ¶21 RCW 7.04A.250(3) provides in pertinent part that “[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under [the uniform arbitration act], the court may add .”
Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc. (2019) washctapp “RCW 7.04A.250(3) provides for an award of attorney fees and litigation expenses in favor of the prevailing party for postaward proceedings.”
Optimer International, Inc. v. RP Bellevue, LLC (2011) wash “First, RCW 7.04A.250(3) permits an award of attorney fees and expenses to a prevailing party in contested judicial proceedings to confirm, vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award.”
McGINNITY v. Autonation, Inc. (2009) washctapp · cites it 4× “030 and RCW 7.04A.250(3). ¶ 21 RCW 7.04A.250(3) provides in pertinent part that "[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under [the uniform arbitration act], the court may add .”
MBNA America Bank, NA v. Miles (2007) washctapp · cites it 3× “1, RCW 7.04A.250, and the express terms of the credit card agreement, MBNA is entitled to attorney fees.”
Futureselect Portfolio Mgmt., Inc. v. Tremont Grp. Holdings, Inc. (2018) wash “280 (providing that an appeal may be taken from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration, without also mentioning an order compelling arbitration), *5 RCW 7.”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2012) washctapp “*98 ¶28 Saleemi requests fees on appeal under RCW 7.04A.250(3), 16 which states: On application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under [RCW] 7.”
Optimer Intern., Inc. v. Rp Bellevue, LLC (2011) wash “First, RCW 7.04A.250(3) permits an award of attorney fees and expenses to a prevailing party in contested judicial proceedings to confirm, vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award.”
In Re The Marriage Of: Donette L. Venn F/k/a Zbikowski, Resp/x-app v. Mark J. Zbikowski, App/x-resp (2019) washctapp · cites it 7× “Because she's the prevailing party under RCW 7.04A.250, we award the mother her attorney fees on appeal.”
Show all 44 citing cases →
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.250(1) — 10 cases
AURC III, LLC v. Point Ruston Phase II, LLC (2024) wash “230 provide narrow grounds for modifying, correcting, or vacating an arbitrator’s award.”
Marvin Olsen, Et Ux v. H. Gary Wallis, Et Ux (2017) washctapp
Cascade Designs, Inc., Respondent/cr-appellant V. Robert Lerner, Appellant/cr-respondent (2021) washctapp
Lu Management Investment Inc, V. Yuan's H&h Property, Llc (2025) washctapp
Joshua Billings, V Town Of Steilacoom (2017) washctapp
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.250(2) — 2 cases
Astronics Electronic Systems Corp v. MAGicALL Inc (2022) wawd
Trina A., Wherry v. David B. Ratner (2014) washctapp
— Wash. Rev. Code § 7.04A.250(3) — 30 cases
Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc. (2019) washctapp “We hold that the trial court abused its discretion when denying Mainline Rock’s application for fees because the trial court misread the law and failed to exercise its discretion under the statute. No.”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc. (2013) wash “190(3) (FIPA attorney fees), 9 and RCW 7.04A.250(3) (arbitration act attorney fees).”
McGinnity v. AutoNation, Inc. (2009) washctapp “030 and RCW 7.04A.250(3). ¶21 RCW 7.04A.250(3) provides in pertinent part that “[o]n application of a prevailing party to a contested judicial proceeding under [the uniform arbitration act], the court may add .”
Mainline Rock & Ballast, Inc. v. Barnes, Inc. (2019) washctapp “RCW 7.04A.250(3) provides for an award of attorney fees and litigation expenses in favor of the prevailing party for postaward proceedings.”
Optimer International, Inc. v. RP Bellevue, LLC (2011) wash “First, RCW 7.04A.250(3) permits an award of attorney fees and expenses to a prevailing party in contested judicial proceedings to confirm, vacate, modify, or correct an arbitration award.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.