Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.06
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.06.080 (2026)

Application date for request under RCW 7.06.050 and 7.06.060

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
RCW 7.06.050 and 7.06.060 apply to all requests for a trial de novo filed pursuant to and in appeal of an arbitrator's decision and filed on or after June 13, 2002.
[ 2002 c 339 s 3.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2011 · leading case: Malted Mousse, Inc. v. Steinmetz, 150 Wash. 2d 518 (Wash. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Malted Mousse, Inc. v. Steinmetz, 150 Wash. 2d 518 (Wash. 2003). “060 so that costs and reasonable attorney fees are now statutorily mandated in the event a party requests a trial de novo and fails to improve his or her position. Laws of 2002, ch. 339, § 2.”
Malted Mousse, Inc. v. Steinmetz, 79 P.3d 1154 (Wash. 2003). “060 so that costs and reasonable attorney fees are now statutorily mandated in the event a party requests a trial de novo and fails to improve his or her position.”
In Re Marriage of Brown, 247 P.3d 466 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “" RCW 7.06.080 (emphasis added). RCW 7.06.020 further indicates that the legislature specifically intended that the arbitration statute— and thus its fees provision—would apply to the spousal maintenance context.”
In re the Marriage of Brown, 159 Wash. App. 931 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “” RCW 7.06.080 (emphasis added). RCW 7.06.020 further indicates that the legislature specifically intended that the arbitration statute — and thus its fees provision — would apply to the spousal maintenance context.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.