Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.16

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.300

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
It may be issued by any court, except district or municipal courts, to an inferior tribunal, or to a corporation, board or person, in all cases where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. It is issued upon affidavit, on the application of the person beneficially interested.
[ 1987 c 202 s 132; 1895 c 65 s 30; RRS s 1028.]

Notes:

Intent—1987 c 202: See note following RCW 2.04.190.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2021 · leading case: Riddle v. Elofson
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Riddle v. Elofson (2019) wash · cites it 2× “2d at 838 ; RCW 7.16.300. "The question as to what constitutes a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy is not dependent upon any general rule, but upon the facts of each particular case, and its determination therefore rests in the sound discretion of the court in which the…”
State v. GAH (2006) washctapp “170; RCW 7.16.300. Those circumstances are not herein present.”
Commanda v. Cary (2001) wash “" RCW 7.16.300. "The fact that an appeal will not lie directly from an interlocutory order is not a sufficient basis for a writ of review if there is an adequate remedy by appeal from the final judgment.”
City of Kirkland v. Ellis (1996) washctapp “” 9 Inconsistently with this argument, the City also argues that the Superior Court erred in granting the writ because the district court’s grant of a continuance was not an appealable order, as it was not a final judgment.”
Ahmad v. Town of Springdale (2013) washctapp “RCW 7.16.300; Leskovar v. Nickels, 140 Wn.”
Barnes v. Thomas (1981) wash “2d 276 (1953); RCW 7.16.300. Total and inarguable absence of jurisdiction cannot be adequately remedied by appeal.”
City of Seattle v. Keene (2001) washctapp “RCW 7.16.300. RCW 7.16.160. RCW 7.16.120(3).”
County of Spokane v. Local 1553, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (1995) washctapp “RCW 7.16.300. The employees argue the employers could have referred the labor dispute to the Washington Public Employment Relations Commission (PERC).”
Stafne v. Snohomish County (2010) washctapp “RCW 7.16.300; Leskovar v. Nickels, 140 Wn.”
In re the Inquest into the Death of Boston (2002) washctapp “In dismissing the Ringolds’ first writ petition to the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court commissioner noted that statutory writs may be available to parties of inquest proceedings pursuant to RCW 7.16.300. The Ringolds never petitioned the Superior Court for a statutory writ,…”
Citizens Council Against Crime v. Bjork (1975) wash “RCW 7.16.300. See Annots., 159 A.L.R. 627 (1945) and 115 A.”
State v. Harris (1970) washctapp “290 and RCW 7.16.300), the Supreme Court recites the following two requirements for the issuance of an extraordinary writ by an appellate court: (1) the trial court acts without or in excess of its jurisdiction, and (2) the remedy at law is inadequate.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.