Wash. Rev. Code » Title 7 · Chapter 7.16

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.16.340

Rules of practice

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the code of procedure concerning civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings in this chapter.
[ 1895 c 65 s 34; RRS s 1032.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1973–2006 · leading case: North Street Ass'n v. City of Olympia
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
North Street Ass'n v. City of Olympia (2006) wash · cites it 2× “That chapter expressly states that "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the code of procedure concerning civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings in this chapter.”
City of Seattle v. Williams (1984) wash · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.340. However, if review of a writ is *457 considered a civil matter for the purposes of RAP 15.”
Griffith v. City of Bellevue (1996) wash · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.340 directs us to apply the civil rules in writ proceedings.”
Crosby v. Spokane County (1999) wash “As we noted there, RCW 7.16.340 directs that the civil rules be applied in writ proceedings, and the purpose of the civil rules is to place substance over form to the end that cases be resolved on the merits.”
Foss Maritime Co. v. City of Seattle (2001) washctapp · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.340, which governs statutory writs of review, provides that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the code of procedure concerning civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings in this chapter.”
Crosby v. County of Spokane (1999) wash “As we noted there, RCW 7.16.340 directs that the civil rules be applied in writ proceedings, and the purpose of the civil rules is to place form over substance to the end that cases be resolved on the merits.”
Levy v. State (1998) washctapp “But RCW 7.16.340 directs the use of the civil rules in writ proceed *944 ings.”
Sterling v. County of Spokane (1982) washctapp “RCW 7.16.340; G-3 Properties, Inc. v. Board of County Comm'rs, 27 Wn.”
Andrus v. County of Snohomish (1973) washctapp “CR 6(b) grants to the superior court the discretion to enlarge a time of performance requirement in a court order, not performed within the time specified because of excusable neglect, when a motion is made for enlargement after the expiration of the specified period.”
Griffith v. City of Bellevue (1995) washctapp · cites it 2× “The court concluded that, under RCW 7.16.340, 6 which provides that the civil rules apply to special proceedings, CR 3(a) is the applicable rule for determining whether a statute of limitations has run.”
G-3 Properties, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners (1980) washctapp · cites it 2× “RCW 7.16.340. Thus, we must look to the rules of civil procedure to determine the method for commencing a writ action and notifying necessary parties.”
King County Council v. King County Personnel Board (1986) washctapp “RCW 7.16.340 provides: Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the code of procedure concerning civil actions are applicable to and constitute the rules of practice in the proceedings in this chapter.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.