Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.52.130 (2026)

Sale of property

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the referees report to the court that the property, of which partition shall have been decreed, or any separate portion thereof is so situated that a partition thereof cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners, and the court is satisfied that such report is correct, it may thereupon by an order direct the referees to sell the property or separate portion thereof.

[Code 1881 s 564; 1877 p 119 s 569; 1869 p 135 s 517; RRS s 850.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Hegewald v. Neal, 582 P.2d 529 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hegewald v. Neal, 582 P.2d 529 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “RCW 7.52.130 provides: If the referees report to the court that the property, of which partition shall have been decreed, or any separate portion thereof is so situated that a partition thereof cannot be made without great prejudice to the owners, and the court is satisfied that…”

Overlake Farms B.l.k. Iii Llc, App. v. Bellevue-overlake Farm, Llc, Resp., 196 Wash. App. 929 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “Below, they acquiesced in both the trial court’s and *937 the Sferras’ view that the statute required partition by sale if the Sferras could prove that they would suffer great prejudice from a partition in kind.”

Andrey Germanovich v. Taisia Moga (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 7.52.130. RCW 7.52.010 applies to several persons who are in possession of real property as tenants in common.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.