Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.56.070 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If judgment be rendered in favor of the relator, he or she shall proceed to exercise the functions of the office, after he or she has been qualified as required by law, and the court shall order the defendant to deliver over all books and papers in his or her custody or within his or her power, belonging to the office from which he or she has been ousted.

[ 2011 c 336 s 240; Code 1881 s 708; 1877 p 144 s 712; 1854 p 217 s 474; RRS s 1040.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2000 · leading case: Cotton v. City of Elma, 998 P.2d 339 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cotton v. City of Elma, 998 P.2d 339 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “]" RCW 7.56.070. "When judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff, he may, if he has not claimed his damages in the information, have his action for the damages at any time within one year after the judgment.”

Cotton v. City of Elma, 100 Wash. App. 685 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “]” RCW 7.56.070. “When judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff, he may, if he has not claimed his damages in the information, have his action for the damages at any time within one year after the judgment.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.