Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 7.56.090 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff, he or she may, if he or she has not claimed his or her damages in the information, have his or her action for the damages at any time within one year after the judgment.

[ 2011 c 336 s 241; Code 1881 s 710; 1877 p 144 s 714; 1854 p 217 s 476; RRS s 1042.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2000 · leading case: Cotton v. City of Elma, 998 P.2d 339 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cotton v. City of Elma, 998 P.2d 339 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “If the trial court grants judgment in favor of the relator, the relator "shall proceed to exercise the functions of the office[.]" RCW 7.”

Cotton v. City of Elma, 100 Wash. App. 685 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “If the trial court grants judgment in favor of the relator, the relator “shall proceed to exercise the functions of the office[.]” RCW 7.56.070. “When judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff, he may, if he has not claimed his damages in the information, have his action…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.