Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 72.40.110 (2026)
Employees' hours of labor
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Employees' hours of labor shall follow all state merit rules as they pertain to various work classifications and current collective bargaining agreements.
Notes:
Severability—Effective date—1985 c 378: See notes following RCW 72.01.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2006–2009 · leading case: Delyria v. Washington State Sch. for Blind, 165 Wash. 2d 559 (Wash. 2009).
Delyria v. Washington State Sch. for Blind, 165 Wash. 2d 559 (Wash. 2009). “First, the WSSBspecific provision, former RCW 72.40.110 (Laws of 1985, ch. 378, § 12), authorized supplemental compensation for WSSB employees working more than 40 hours per week.”
Delyria v. State, 199 P.3d 980 (Wash. 2009). “First, the WSSB-specific provision, former RCW 72.40.110 (Laws of 1985, ch. 378, § 12), authorized supplemental compensation for WSSB employees working more than 40 hours per week.”
Savlesky v. Washington Sch. for the Deaf, 139 Wash. App. 245 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “The School argues that in enacting RCW 72.40.110, the legislature made a policy choice to exclude School employees from receiving TRI payments and instead to provide them with compensatory (or exchange) time and protection under collective bargaining agreements.”
Savlesky v. State, Wash. Sch. for the Deaf, 136 P.3d 152 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “The School argues that in enacting RCW 72.40.110, the legislature made a policy choice to exclude School employees from receiving TRI payments and instead to provide them with compensatory (or exchange) time and protection under collective bargaining agreements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.