Wash. Rev. Code » Title 8 · Chapter 8.04
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 8.04.150 (2026)

Appellate review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Either party may seek appellate review of the judgment for damages entered in the superior court within thirty days after the entry of judgment as aforesaid, and such review shall bring before the supreme court or the court of appeals the propriety and justness of the amount of damages in respect to the parties to the review: PROVIDED HOWEVER, That upon such review no bond shall be required: AND PROVIDED FURTHER, That if the owner of land, the real estate or premises accepts the sum awarded by the jury, the court or the judge thereof, he or she shall be deemed thereby to have waived conclusively appellate review, and final judgment by default may be rendered in the superior court as in other cases: PROVIDED FURTHER, That no review shall operate so as to prevent the said state of Washington from taking possession of such property pending review after the amount of said award shall have been paid into court.
[ 2011 c 336 s 256; 1988 c 202 s 8; 1971 c 81 s 36; 1891 c 74 s 9; RRS s 899.]

Notes:

Rules of court: Cf. RAP 5.2, 8.1, 18.22.
Severability—1988 c 202: See note following RCW 2.24.050.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1956–2024 · leading case: State v. Trask, 91 Wash. App. 253 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Trask, 91 Wash. App. 253 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “130 and RCW 8.04.150. 13 RCW 8.04.130 provides: Upon the entry of judgment upon the verdict of the jury or the decision of the court awarding damages, the state may make payment of the damages and the costs of the proceedings by depositing them with the clerk of the court.”
State v. Wachsmith, 479 P.2d 943 (Wash. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 3× “They contend their position is buttressed by the portion of RCW 8.04.150 reading as follows: Provided further, That no appeal shall operate so as to prevent the said state of Washington from taking possession of such property pending such appeal after the amount of said award…”
State v. Trask, 957 P.2d 781 (Wash. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “130 and RCW 8.04.150. [13] RCW 8.04.130 provides: Upon the entry of judgment upon the verdict of the jury or the decision of the court awarding damages, the state may make payment of the damages and the costs of the proceedings by depositing them with the clerk of the court.”
State v. Costich, 117 Wash. App. 491 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “” RCW 8.04.150. But Mr. Costich did not appeal the sum awarded by the jury.”
State Ex Rel. Eastvold v. Sup'r Ct. for Snohomish Cty., 294 P.2d 418 (Wash. 1956). “RCW 8.04.150; Coats-Fordney Logging Co. v.”
State v. McKenzie, 355 P.2d 834 (Wash. 1960). “RCW 8.04.150; Coats-Fordney Logging Co. v.”
State v. Smithrock Quarry, Inc., 304 P.2d 1043 (Wash. 1956). “130 and RCW 8.04.150 [cf. Rem. Rev. Stat., § 899], which gives the state a right of appeal in condemnation cases.”
State v. Scheel, 443 P.2d 658 (Wash. 1968). “The sole issue in this case is whether or not the appellants can attack the judgments and decrees of appropriation as to items 2 and 4 in a later petition for distribution, held under authority of RCW 8.”
State v. Laws, 322 P.2d 134 (Wash. 1957). · cites it 2× “*348 The appellant contends that its actions were authorized and justified under the provisions of RCW 8.04.150: “Appeal. Either party may appeal from the judgment for damages entered in the superior court, to the supreme court of the state, within thirty days after the entry of…”
State v. Costich, 72 P.3d 190 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “" RCW 8.04.150. But Mr. Costich did not appeal the sum awarded by the jury.”
Michelle Merceri, V. State Of Wa Dept. Of Transp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “150, which states, Either party may seek appellate review of the judgment for damages entered in the superior court within thirty days after the entry of judgment as aforesaid, and such review shall bring before the supreme court or the court of appeals the propriety and…”
Michelle Merceri V. Dept. Of Transp. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 5× “150, which states, Either party may seek appellate review of the judgment for damages entered in the superior court within thirty days after the entry of judgment as aforesaid, and such review shall bring before the supreme court or the court of appeals the propriety and…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.