Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 8.12.100 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the return of said summons, or as soon thereafter as the business of court will permit, the said court shall proceed to the hearing of such petition and shall impanel a jury to ascertain the just compensation to be paid for the property taken or damaged, but if any defendant or party in interest shall demand, and the court shall deem it proper, separate juries may be impaneled as to the compensation or damages to be paid to any one or more of such defendants or parties in interest.

[ 1907 c 153 s 7; RRS s 9221. Prior: 1905 c 55 s 7; 1893 c 84 s 7.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2023 · leading case: Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. V. Marymoor Storage Partners Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. V. Marymoor Storage Partners Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “Where there are separate interests in the property, and “if any defendant or party in interest shall demand,” the court may impanel separate juries “as to the compensation or damages to be paid to any one or more of such defendants or parties in interest,” so long as the party…”

Cent. Puget Sound Rta v. Sternoff L.p. (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “090; RCW 8.12.100. Sternoff argued the petition should be dismissed entirely because Sound Transit's board acted arbitrarily and capriciously in adopting R2013-21 or, in the alternative, Sound Transit should not be permitted to acquire property for the City's street widening…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.