Wash. Rev. Code § 80.36.160
Physical connections may be ordered, routing prescribed, and joint rates established
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In order to provide toll telephone service where no such service is available, or to promote the most expeditious handling or most direct routing of toll messages and conversations, or to prevent arbitrary or unreasonable practices which may result in the failure to utilize the toll facilities of all telecommunications companies equitably and effectively, the commission may, on its own motion, or upon complaint, notwithstanding any contract or arrangement between telecommunications companies, investigate, ascertain and, after hearing, by order (1) require the construction and maintenance of suitable connections between telephone lines for the transfer of messages and conversations at a common point or points and, if the companies affected fail to agree on the proportion of the cost thereof to be borne by each such company, prescribe said proportion of cost to be borne by each; and/or (2) prescribe the routing of toll messages and conversations over such connections and the practices and regulations to be followed with respect to such routing; and/or (3) establish reasonable joint rates or charges by or over said lines and connections and just, reasonable and equitable divisions thereof as between the telecommunications companies participating therein.
This section shall not be construed as conferring on the commission jurisdiction, supervision or control of the rates, service or facilities of any mutual, cooperative or farmer line company or association, except for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this section.
[ 1985 c 450 s 30; 1961 c 14 s 80.36.160. Prior: 1943 c 68 s 1; 1923 c 118 s 1; 1911 c 117 s 73; Rem. Supp. 1943 s 10409.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1965–1994 · leading case: Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Telecommunications Ratepayers Ass'n for Cost-based & Equitable Rates
Washington Independent Telephone Ass'n v. Telecommunications Ratepayers Ass'n for Cost-based & Equitable Rates (1994)
“A WITA initially relies on RCW 80.36.160, which provides in part as follows: Physical connections may be ordered, routing prescribed, and joint rates established.”
State Ex Rel. Pac. Nw Bell Telephone Co. v. Wa. U. & T. Com. (1965)
“We have been requested to assume jurisdiction under RCW 80.36.160 in order to make a reasonable and equitable division of toll revenues obtained from the interchange between the parties of intrastate toll telephone messages.”
State v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission (1965)
“We have been requested to assume jurisdiction under RCW 80.36.160 in order to make a reasonable and equitable division of toll revenues obtained from the interchange between the parties of intrastate toll telephone messages.”
Peninsula Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission (1978)
“The Commission assumed jurisdiction under RCW 80.36.160, which provides, in pertinent part: In order to provide toll telephone service where no such service is available, or to promote the most expeditious handling or most direct routing of toll messages and conversations, or to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.