Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 81.104.010 (2026)

Purpose

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Increasing congestion on Washington's roadways calls for identification and implementation of high capacity transportation system alternatives. The legislature believes that local jurisdictions should coordinate and be responsible for high capacity transportation policy development, program planning, and implementation. The state should assist by working with local agencies on issues involving rights-of-way, partially financing projects meeting established state criteria including development and completion of the high occupancy vehicle lane system, authorizing local jurisdictions to finance high capacity transportation systems through voter-approved tax options, and providing technical assistance and information.

[ 1992 c 101 s 18; 1991 c 318 s 1; 1990 c 43 s 22.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2014 · leading case: City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Props., Inc., 340 P.3d 938 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Bellevue v. Pine Forest Props., Inc., 340 P.3d 938 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “200, RCW 81.104.010, RCW 81.112.080, RCW 35A.11.”

Pine Forest Props. v. City Of Bellevue (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 3× “2 As amended, codified at RCW 81.104.010. No. 71827-4-1/3 downtown Seattle to Mercer Island, south Bellevue, downtown Bellevue, Bel-Red, the area between State Route 520 and Bel-Red Road, and Overlake, the "East Link Project.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.