Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 81.104.180 (2026)
Pledge of revenues for bond retirement
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Cities that operate transit systems, county transportation authorities, metropolitan municipal corporations, public transportation benefit areas, high capacity transportation corridor areas, and regional transit authorities are authorized to pledge revenues from the employer tax authorized by RCW 81.104.150, the taxes authorized by RCW 81.104.160, the sales and use tax authorized by RCW 81.104.170, the property tax authorized by RCW 81.104.175, and the parking tax authorized by RCW 81.104.230, to retire bonds issued solely for the purpose of providing high capacity transportation service.
Notes:
Effective date—2015 3rd sp.s. c 44: See note following RCW 46.68.395.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: Pierce Cnty. v. State, 148 P.3d 1002 (Wash. 2006).
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 148 P.3d 1002 (Wash. 2006). “ś 52 Turning to the intervenors' challenge to the validity of the bonds, the intervenors contend that the Sound Transit *1019 bonds were invalid because Sound Transit exceeded its statutory authority under RCW 81.104.180. RCW 81.104.180 provides in relevant part: [R]egional…”
Pierce Cnty. v. State, 159 Wash. 2d 16 (Wash. 2006). “¶52 Turning to the intervenors’ challenge to the validity of the bonds, the intervenors contend that the Sound Transit Bonds were invalid because Sound Transit exceeded its statutory authority under RCW 81.104.180. RCW 81.104.180 provides in relevant part: [RJegional transit…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.