Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 84.55.005 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2442-S.SL) ***
The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.
(1) "Inflation" means the percentage change in the implicit price deflator for personal consumption expenditures for the United States as published for the most recent twelve-month period by the bureau of economic analysis of the federal department of commerce by September 25th of the year before the taxes are payable;
(2) "Limit factor" means:
(a) For taxing districts with a population of less than ten thousand in the calendar year prior to the assessment year, one hundred one percent;
(b) For taxing districts for which a limit factor is authorized under RCW 84.55.0101, the lesser of the limit factor authorized under that section or one hundred one percent;
(c) For all other districts, the lesser of one hundred one percent or one hundred percent plus inflation; and
(3) "Regular property taxes" has the meaning given it in RCW 84.04.140.
[ 2014 c 97 s 316; 2007 sp.s. c 1 s 1. Prior: 1997 c 393 s 20; 1997 c 3 s 201 (Referendum Bill No. 47, approved November 4, 1997); 1994 c 301 s 49; 1983 1st ex.s. c 62 s 11.]

Notes:

Reviser's note: On November 8, 2007, Initiative Measure No. 747 was declared unconstitutional in its entirety in Wash. Citizens Action of Wash. v. State, 162 Wn.2d 142, 171 P.3d 486 (2007).
ApplicationEffective date2007 sp.s. c 1: See notes following RCW 84.55.0101.
Intent1997 c 3 ss 201-207: See note following RCW 84.55.010.
ApplicationSeverabilityPart headings not lawReferral to electorate1997 c 3: See notes following RCW 84.40.030.
Short titleIntentEffective datesApplicability1983 1st ex.s. c 62: See notes following RCW 84.36.477.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2017 · leading case: Washington Citizens Action v. State, 162 Wash. 2d 142 (Wash. 2007).
Washington Citizens Action v. State, 162 Wash. 2d 142 (Wash. 2007). · cites it 2× “2 Section 2 of I-747 explains that *149 RCW 84.55.005 and 2001 c 2 s 5 (Initiative Measure No.”
Washington Citizens Action of Washington v. State, 171 P.3d 486 (Wash. 2007). · cites it 2× “[2] Section 2 of I-747 explains that: RCW 84.55.005 and 2001 c 2 s 5 (Initiative Measure No.”
End Prison Indus. Complex v. King Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 5× “The limit factor, which is defined by RCW 84.55.005(2), is 101 percent.2 RCW 84.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 84.55.005(2) — 1 case
End Prison Indus. Complex v. King Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “The limit factor, which is defined by RCW 84.55.005(2), is 101 percent.2 RCW 84.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 84.55.005(2)(a) — 1 case
End Prison Indus. Complex v. King Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “The limit factor, which is defined by RCW 84.55.005(2), is 101 percent.2 RCW 84.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 84.55.005(2)(c) — 1 case
End Prison Indus. Complex v. King Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “The limit factor, which is defined by RCW 84.55.005(2), is 101 percent.2 RCW 84.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.