Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.827 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In a criminal case where:
(1) The defendant has been convicted of (a) manufacture of a controlled substance under RCW 69.50.401 relating to manufacture of methamphetamine; or (b) possession of ephedrine or any of its salts or isomers or salts of isomers, pseudoephedrine or any of its salts or isomers or salts of isomers, pressurized ammonia gas, or pressurized ammonia gas solution with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, as defined in RCW 69.50.440; and
(2) There has been a special allegation pleaded and proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime when a person under the age of eighteen was present in or upon the premises of manufacture;
the court shall make a finding of fact of the special allegation, or if a jury trial is had, the jury shall, if it finds the defendant guilty, also find a special verdict as to the special allegation.
[ 2003 c 53 s 60; 2002 c 134 s 3; 2000 c 132 s 1. Formerly RCW 9.94A.605, 9.94A.128.]

Notes:

IntentEffective date2003 c 53: See notes following RCW 2.48.180.
Effective date2002 c 134: See note following RCW 69.50.440.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: State v. Conover, 355 P.3d 1093 (Wash. 2015).
State v. Conover, 355 P.3d 1093 (Wash. 2015). “RCW 9.94A.827 relates to the manufacture of methamphetamine, which is not relevant to this case.”
State v. Conover (Wash. 2015). “2d at 245 . Our primary objective is to determine and to apply the 2 RCW 69.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.