Wash. Rev. Code » Title 9 · Chapter 9.94B
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94B.010 (2026)

Application of chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) This chapter codifies sentencing provisions that may be applicable to sentences for crimes committed prior to July 1, 2000.
(2) This chapter supplements chapter 9.94A RCW and should be read in conjunction with that chapter.
[ 2008 c 231 s 51.]

Notes:

Intent—Application—Application of repealers—Effective date—2008 c 231: See notes following RCW 9.94A.701.
Severability—2008 c 231: See note following RCW 9.94A.500.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: State v. Buck, 544 P.3d 506 (Wash. 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Buck, 544 P.3d 506 (Wash. 2024). · cites it 3× “”); RCW 9.94B.010. In 2020, the legislature amended RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Brandon M. Bigsby, App., 384 P.3d 668 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “94B RCW “codifies sentencing provisions that may be applicable to sentences for crimes committed prior to July 1,2000.”
State Of Washington v. Sallyea Mcclinton, 448 P.3d 101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “” But, under RCW 9.94B.010(1) and 9.94B.040(1), a court has authority to impose sanctions on an offender who committed their underlying crime before July 1, 2000.”
State v. Bigsby (Wash. 2017). · cites it 2× “14, 2015) at 7 (explaining that it could, it "suppose[d], excuse [Bigsby's] failure to show up for that hearing" since he was in the Department's custody at the time of the scheduled hearing). 3 State v. Bigsby, No. 93987-0 9.”
State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-respondent v. Katrina Lacy, Respondent/cross-appellant (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “However, the State does not argue that Lacy did not have authority to file her motion.”
State Of Washington, V. Ronald Bianchi (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “” RCW 9.94B.010(2) states that chapter 9.94B RCW supplements chapter 9.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94B.010(1) — 5 cases
State v. Buck, 544 P.3d 506 (Wash. 2024). “”); RCW 9.94B.010. In 2020, the legislature amended RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, Resp. v. Brandon M. Bigsby, App., 384 P.3d 668 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “94B RCW “codifies sentencing provisions that may be applicable to sentences for crimes committed prior to July 1,2000.”
State Of Washington v. Sallyea Mcclinton, 448 P.3d 101 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “” But, under RCW 9.94B.010(1) and 9.94B.040(1), a court has authority to impose sanctions on an offender who committed their underlying crime before July 1, 2000.”
State v. Bigsby (Wash. 2017). “14, 2015) at 7 (explaining that it could, it "suppose[d], excuse [Bigsby's] failure to show up for that hearing" since he was in the Department's custody at the time of the scheduled hearing). 3 State v. Bigsby, No. 93987-0 9.”
State Of Washington, Appellant/cross-respondent v. Katrina Lacy, Respondent/cross-appellant (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “However, the State does not argue that Lacy did not have authority to file her motion.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94B.010(2) — 2 cases
State v. Buck, 544 P.3d 506 (Wash. 2024). “”); RCW 9.94B.010. In 2020, the legislature amended RCW 9.”
State Of Washington, V. Ronald Bianchi (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “” RCW 9.94B.010(2) states that chapter 9.94B RCW supplements chapter 9.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.