Wash. Rev. Code § 90.14.010

Purpose

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The future growth and development of the state is dependent upon effective management and efficient use of the state's water resources. The purpose of this chapter is to provide adequate records for efficient administration of the state's waters, and to cause a return to the state of any water rights which are no longer exercised by putting said waters to beneficial use.
[ 1967 c 233 s 1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings Board
R.D. Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Hearings Board (1999) wash “” RCW 90.14.010. RCW 90.14.020(3) provides that “[a] strong beneficial use requirement as a condition precedent to the continued ownership of a right to withdraw or divert water is essential to the orderly development of the state .”
Willowbrook Farms, L.L.P. v. Department of Ecology (2003) washctapp “” RCW 90.14.010. Ministerial Act Black’s Law Dictionary 1011 (7th ed.”
City of Union Gap v. Department of Ecology (2008) washctapp “” RCW 90.14.010. RCW 90.14.020(3) provides that “[a] strong beneficial use requirement as a condition precedent to the continued ownership of a right to withdraw or divert water is essential to the orderly development of the state .”
Willowbrook Farms LLP v. Department of Ecology (2003) washctapp “" RCW 90.14.010. MINISTERIAL ACT Black's Law Dictionary 1011 (7th ed.”
City of Union Gap v. STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY (2008) washctapp “" RCW 90.14.010. RCW 90.14.020(3) provides that "[a] strong beneficial use requirement as a condition precedent to the continued ownership of a right to withdraw or divert water is essential to the orderly development of the state.”
Benton County Water Conservancy Bd. v. Dep't of Ecology (2023) washctapp · cites it 2× “The Board also complains that by refusing to process divisional requests 2 The authority cited in support of this claim is RCW 90.14.010 and RCW 90.54.030, which require Ecology to maintain records for the efficient administration of our state’s waters.”
RD Merrill Co. v. Pollution Control Bd. (1999) wash “" RCW 90.14.010. RCW 90.14.020(3) provides that "[a] strong beneficial use requirement as a condition precedent to the continued ownership of a right to withdraw or divert water is essential to the orderly development of the state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.