Wash. Rev. Code » Title 90 · Chapter 90.58
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.010 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Shoreline Management Act of 1971".
[ 1971 ex.s. c 286 s 1.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: Orion Corp. v. State, 693 P.2d 1369 (Wash. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Orion Corp. v. State, 693 P.2d 1369 (Wash. 1985). · cites it 6× “In view of the foregoing, it is not surprising that when the State enacted the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, RCW 90.58.010 et seq., the Legislature specifically classified Padilla Bay as one of five shorelines of statewide significance.”
Biggers v. City of Bainbridge Island, 162 Wash. 2d 683 (Wash. 2007). “See RCW 90.58.010 through .920. Under the plain terms of the SMA, there is no provision for cities to adopt moratoria.”
South Hill Sewer Dist. v. Pierce Cnty., 591 P.2d 877 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “ll Sewer District may locate their sewage treatment plant in unincorporated Pierce County without regard to the limitations of the Pierce County zoning regulations and that therefore, the plaintiffs need not obtain an unclassified use permit or a substantial development permit…”
Pac. Cnty. v. Sherwood Pac., Inc., 567 P.2d 642 (Wash. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendants further argue performance was made impossible because of the subsequent adoption of the Washington Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (RCW 90.58.010 et seq.) and the Federal Environmental Protection Act.”
Scott v. City of Seattle, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (W.D. Wash. 1999). “This statute provides for enforcement under the Shoreline Management Act ("SMA”) which is codified at RCW 90.58.010 et seq. 5 . Injunctive relief was mooted after plaintiffs left Diamond’s marina.”
Biggers v. City of Bainbridge Island, 169 P.3d 14 (Wash. 2007). “See RCW 90.58.010 through .920. Under the plain terms of the SMA, there is no provision for cities to adopt moratoria.”
Ncng, Llc, V Clark Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “See generally RCW 90.58.010 et seq.; Clark County Code (CCC) 40.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.