Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.040 (2026)

Program applicable to shorelines of the state

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The shoreline management program of this chapter shall apply to the shorelines of the state as defined in this chapter.

[ 1971 ex.s. c 286 s 4.]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 114 P.3d 1233 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 114 P.3d 1233 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 90.58.040. Mr. Harrington asserts that his canal property either has never been classified as shoreline or that it was erroneously so classified.”

Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 128 Wash. App. 202 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 90.58.040. Mr. Harrington asserts that his canal property either has never been classified as shoreline or that it was erroneously so classified.”

Ncng, Llc, V Clark Cnty. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 90.58.040; Buechel, 125 Wn.2d at 203-04 .”

Peter Weymiller & Kathryn Weymiller, V. David Ringlee & Betty Ringlee (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Violations of the Shoreline Management Act The superior court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the Weymillers’ nuisance claim based on the theory that the Ringlees violated the SMA was frivolous.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.