Wash. Rev. Code » Title 90 · Chapter 90.58
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.040 (2025)

Program applicable to shorelines of the state

✓ laws through the 2025 session: 2026 session laws are not yet included
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The shoreline management program of this chapter shall apply to the shorelines of the state as defined in this chapter.
[ 1971 ex.s. c 286 s 4.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2024 · leading case: Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 114 P.3d 1233 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 114 P.3d 1233 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 90.58.040. Mr. Harrington asserts that his canal property either has never been classified as shoreline or that it was erroneously so classified.”
Harrington v. Spokane Cnty., 128 Wash. App. 202 (Wash. Ct. App. 2005). “RCW 90.58.040. Mr. Harrington asserts that his canal property either has never been classified as shoreline or that it was erroneously so classified.”
Ncng, LLC, V Clark Cnty., No. 58452-2 (Wash. Ct. App. June 18, 2024). “RCW 90.58.040; Buechel, 125 Wn.2d at 203-04 .”
Peter Weymiller & Kathryn Weymiller, V. David Ringlee & Betty Ringlee, No. 58618-5 (Wash. Ct. App. July 30, 2024). “Violations of the Shoreline Management Act The superior court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that the Weymillers’ nuisance claim based on the theory that the Ringlees violated the SMA was frivolous.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.