Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.070 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Local governments are directed with regard to shorelines of the state in their various jurisdictions to submit to the director of the department, within six months from June 1, 1971, letters stating that they propose to complete an inventory and develop master programs for these shorelines as provided for in RCW 90.58.080.
(2) If any local government fails to submit a letter as provided in subsection (1) of this section, or fails to adopt a master program for the shorelines of the state within its jurisdiction in accordance with the time schedule provided in this chapter, the department shall carry out the requirements of RCW 90.58.080 and adopt a master program for the shorelines of the state within the jurisdiction of the local government.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1994–2011 · leading case: Buechel v. Dep't of Ecology, 884 P.2d 910 (Wash. 1994).
Buechel v. Dep't of Ecology, 884 P.2d 910 (Wash. 1994). “19 RCW 90.58.070, .080. 20 RCW 90.58.090. 21 See generally Ralph W.”
Citizens for Rational Shoreline Plan. v. Whatcom Cnty., 230 P.3d 1074 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “RCW 90.58.070, .080. If the local government does not discharge this obligation, Ecology is empowered to unilaterally develop and impose an SMP on that jurisdiction.”
Futurewise v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 189 P.3d 161 (Wash. 2008). “RCW 90.58.070(1). The plans must be updated every seven years to make sure they still comply with the law.”
Futurewise v. W. Washington Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 164 Wash. 2d 242 (Wash. 2008). “RCW 90.58.070(1). The plans must be updated every seven years to make sure they still comply with the law.”
Citizens for Rational Shoreline Plan. v. Whatcom Cnty., 258 P.3d 36 (Wash. 2011). “See RCW 90.58.070. The SMA also details specific guidelines with *392 which an SMP must conform.”
Samuel's Furniture, Inc. v. Dep't of Ecology, 19 P.3d 474 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “RCW 90.58.070, .090. The SMA specifically provides that the Department (through the attorney general) and local governments are empowered to initiate court actions to ensure compliance with the act.”
CRSP. v. Whatcom Cnty., 230 P.3d 1074 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “RCW 90.58.070, .080. If the local government does not discharge this obligation, Ecology is empowered to unilaterally develop and impose a SMP on that jurisdiction.”
Samuel's Furniture v. Dep't of Ecology, 19 P.3d 474 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). “RCW 90.58.070, 090. The SMA specifically provides that the Department (through the attorney general) and local governments are empowered to initiate court actions to ensure compliance with the act.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.070(1) — 2 cases
Futurewise v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 189 P.3d 161 (Wash. 2008). “RCW 90.58.070(1). The plans must be updated every seven years to make sure they still comply with the law.”
Futurewise v. W. Washington Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 164 Wash. 2d 242 (Wash. 2008). “RCW 90.58.070(1). The plans must be updated every seven years to make sure they still comply with the law.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.070(2) — 2 cases
Citizens for Rational Shoreline Plan. v. Whatcom Cnty., 230 P.3d 1074 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “RCW 90.58.070, .080. If the local government does not discharge this obligation, Ecology is empowered to unilaterally develop and impose an SMP on that jurisdiction.”
CRSP. v. Whatcom Cnty., 230 P.3d 1074 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “RCW 90.58.070, .080. If the local government does not discharge this obligation, Ecology is empowered to unilaterally develop and impose a SMP on that jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.