Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 90.58.150 (2026)
Selective commercial timber cutting, when
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
With respect to timber situated within two hundred feet abutting landward of the ordinary high water mark within shorelines of statewide significance, the department or local government shall allow only selective commercial timber cutting, so that no more than thirty percent of the merchantable trees may be harvested in any ten year period of time: PROVIDED, That other timber harvesting methods may be permitted in those limited instances where the topography, soil conditions or silviculture practices necessary for regeneration render selective logging ecologically detrimental: PROVIDED FURTHER, That clear cutting of timber which is solely incidental to the preparation of land for other uses authorized by this chapter may be permitted.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1974–1975 · leading case: Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings Bd., 536 P.2d 157 (Wash. 1975).
Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings Bd., 536 P.2d 157 (Wash. 1975). “180(1) refers to "rescinding a permit pursuant to RCW 90.58.150." However, RCW 90.58.150 regulates timber *451 cutting and not rescission of permits.”
Dep't of Ecology v. Ballard Elks Lodge No. 827, 527 P.2d 1121 (Wash. 1974). “1 ‘(1) Any person aggrieved by the granting or denying of a permit on shorelines of the state, or rescinding a permit pursuant to RCW 90.58.150 may seek review from the shorelines hearings board by filing a request for the same within thirty days of receipt of the final order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.