Notes of Decisions
Cited in
64
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case:
State v. Setagord, 565 N.W.2d 506 (Wis. 1997).
State v. Setagord, 565 N.W.2d 506 (Wis. 1997).
· cites it 16× “The court held that the statute allows the circuit court only two options, either to determine parole eligibility pursuant to the standards under Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (1), [3] or *404 to set an alternative parole eligibility date of its own.”
State Ex Rel. Singh v. Kemper, 2016 WI 67 (Wis. 2016).
· cites it 17× “113 (2)(b) (2009-10) were instead eligible pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (1)(bg)1. (2009-10). Under the latter statute, inmates earned one day of positive adjustment time for every three days served.”
State Ex Rel. Britt v. Gamble, 2002 WI App 238 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 38× “We further agree that Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lr) (1989-90) neither created nor conferred a due process liberty interest in parole release, and its repeal merely affects a petitioner's opportunity to take advantage of a provision for early release.”
State-Dep't of Corr. v. Schwarz, 2005 WI 34 (Wis. 2005).
· cites it 8× “072(3) in conjunction with Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (3) and other statutes governing parole supervision.”
State v. LaCount, 2008 WI 59 (Wis. 2008).
· cites it 4× “Because of Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (1)(b), regardless of the exact sentence that LaCount had received on that previous felony conviction, the earliest date that LaCount would have been eligible to have been released from confinement on discretionary parole would have been six months…”
State v. Wills, 523 N.W.2d 569 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
· cites it 12× “Wills pled to these charges pursuant to the State's agreement to recommend that his eligibility for parole be determined by the parole commission under § 304.06(1), STATS., [1] and not by the trial court under *532 § 973.”
State Ex Rel. Szymanski v. Gamble, 2001 WI App 118 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 15× “He argued that since the commission had found extraordinary circumstances warranting his early release pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lm), he was entitled to release on parole.”
State v. Borrell, 482 N.W.2d 883 (Wis. 1992).
· cites it 4× “Section 304.06(1) (b), Stats. This arrangement causes the particular sentence imposed to be determinative of the defendant's parole eligibility date.”
State v. Byrge, 2000 WI 101 (Wis. 2000).
· cites it 4× “014 required the sentencing court to exercise one of two options by: 1) determining that the defendant is eligible for parole under Wis. Stat. § 304.06 , or 2) setting a parole eligibility date.”
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 44× “, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
State v. Trujillo, 2005 WI 45 (Wis. 2005).
· cites it 4× “Furthermore, Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (1)(b) states that an inmate becomes eligible for parole after serving one-quarter of his or her sentence.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1) — 13 cases
State v. Wills, 523 N.W.2d 569 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
“Wills pled to these charges pursuant to the State's agreement to recommend that his eligibility for parole be determined by the parole commission under § 304.06(1), STATS., [1] and not by the trial court under *532 § 973.”
State v. Borrell, 482 N.W.2d 883 (Wis. 1992).
“Section 304.06(1) (b), Stats. This arrangement causes the particular sentence imposed to be determinative of the defendant's parole eligibility date.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(b) — 7 cases
State v. Wills, 523 N.W.2d 569 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
“Wills pled to these charges pursuant to the State's agreement to recommend that his eligibility for parole be determined by the parole commission under § 304.06(1), STATS., [1] and not by the trial court under *532 § 973.”
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(bg) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Singh v. Kemper, 2016 WI 67 (Wis. 2016).
“113 (2)(b) (2009-10) were instead eligible pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (1)(bg)1. (2009-10). Under the latter statute, inmates earned one day of positive adjustment time for every three days served.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(e) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(em) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1)(f) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1r) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Britt v. Gamble, 2002 WI App 238 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).
“We further agree that Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lr) (1989-90) neither created nor conferred a due process liberty interest in parole release, and its repeal merely affects a petitioner's opportunity to take advantage of a provision for early release.”
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(1r)(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(2) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(3) — 5 cases
State-Dep't of Corr. v. Schwarz, 2005 WI 34 (Wis. 2005).
“072(3) in conjunction with Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (3) and other statutes governing parole supervision.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(l)(b) — 10 cases
State v. Borrell, 482 N.W.2d 883 (Wis. 1992).
“Section 304.06(1) (b), Stats. This arrangement causes the particular sentence imposed to be determinative of the defendant's parole eligibility date.”
State v. Wills, 523 N.W.2d 569 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
“Wills pled to these charges pursuant to the State's agreement to recommend that his eligibility for parole be determined by the parole commission under § 304.06(1), STATS., [1] and not by the trial court under *532 § 973.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(l)(c) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(l)(e) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(l)(g) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(lm) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Szymanski v. Gamble, 2001 WI App 118 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
“He argued that since the commission had found extraordinary circumstances warranting his early release pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lm), he was entitled to release on parole.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(lm)(a) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Szymanski v. Gamble, 2001 WI App 118 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
“He argued that since the commission had found extraordinary circumstances warranting his early release pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lm), he was entitled to release on parole.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(lr) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Britt v. Gamble, 2002 WI App 238 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).
“We further agree that Wis. Stat. § 304.06 (lr) (1989-90) neither created nor conferred a due process liberty interest in parole release, and its repeal merely affects a petitioner's opportunity to take advantage of a provision for early release.”
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
— Wis. Stat. § 304.06(lr)(a) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Saenz v. Husz, 542 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“, provides that the commission shall parole certain inmates unless there are overriding considerations, there is a presumption in favor of parole for inmates meeting the criteria of § 304.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
