Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 48.297 (2026)

Motions before trial

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
48.29748.297Motions before trial.
48.297(1)(1)Any motion which is capable of determination without trial of the general issue may be made before trial.
48.297(2)(2)Defenses and objections based on defects in the institution of proceedings, lack of probable cause on the face of the petition, insufficiency of the petition or invalidity in whole or in part of the statute on which the petition is founded shall be raised not later than 10 days after the plea hearing or be deemed waived. Other motions capable of determination without trial may be brought any time before trial.
48.297(3)(3)Motions to suppress evidence as having been illegally seized or statements as having been illegally obtained shall be made before fact-finding on the issues. The court may entertain the motion at the fact-finding hearing if it appears that a party is surprised by the attempt to introduce such evidence and that party waives jeopardy.
48.297(4)(4)Although the taking of a child or an expectant mother of an unborn child into custody is not an arrest, that taking into custody shall be considered an arrest for the purpose of deciding motions which require a decision about the propriety of taking into custody, including motions to suppress evidence as illegally seized, motions to suppress statements as illegally obtained and motions challenging the lawfulness of the taking into custody.
48.297(5)(5)If the child or the expectant mother of an unborn child is in custody and the court grants a motion to dismiss based on a defect in the petition or in the institution of the proceedings, the court may order the child or expectant mother to be continued in custody for not more than 48 hours pending the filing of a new petition.
48.297(6)(6)A motion required to be served on a child may be served on his or her attorney of record.
48.297(7)(7)Oral argument permitted on motions under this section may be heard by telephone under s. 807.13 (1).
48.297 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 354; 1979 c. 300, 331, 359; Sup. Ct. Order, 141 Wis. 2d xiii (1987); 1995 a. 77; 1997 a. 35, 292; 2013 a. 170.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1990–2024 · leading case: C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990).
C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “waived his right to challenge the timeliness of the delinquency petitions in this case because his motion to dismiss was filed twenty-one days after the plea hearing.”
In Interest of Jermaine Tj, 510 N.W.2d 735 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “See sec. 48.297(2), Stats. At a plea hearing, the juvenile must be advised of the allegations in the petition and the nature and possible consequences of the delinquency proceedings.”
Brown Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. T. R. (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 14× “§ 48.297 but she argues that WIS. STAT. chs.”
Barron Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. M. S. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 6× “§ 48.297(1) provides: “Any motion which is capable of determination without trial of the general issue may be made before trial.”
State v. S. S. M. (Wis. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “§ 48.297; therefore, her constitutional challenge is waived.”
In Interest of CAK, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “The state maintains that sec. 48.297(2), Stats., provides that objections based on defects in the institution of proceedings under ch.”
State v. I. B. (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 48.297(2) (stating that “[d]efenses and objections based on defects in the institution of proceedings … shall be raised not later than 10 days after the plea hearing or be deemed waived” and “[o]ther motions capable of determination without trial may be brought any time before…”
State v. J. S. (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “¶14 Julia claims that, at the November 21, 2022 hearing, she preserved her argument that the circuit court lacked personal jurisdiction over her because the summons and original petitions were not served on her.”
M. S. v. R. F. (Wis. Ct. App. 2024). “§ 48.297(2). Richard also filed a motion for sole legal custody and placement in which he argued that Michelle no longer had standing to continue pursuing the termination of Richard’s parental rights because she voluntarily terminated her parental rights.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.297(1) — 2 cases
Barron Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. M. S. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 48.297(1) provides: “Any motion which is capable of determination without trial of the general issue may be made before trial.”
Brown Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. T. R. (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 48.297 but she argues that WIS. STAT. chs.”
— Wis. Stat. § 48.297(2) — 9 cases
C.A.K. v. State, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “waived his right to challenge the timeliness of the delinquency petitions in this case because his motion to dismiss was filed twenty-one days after the plea hearing.”
In Interest of Jermaine Tj, 510 N.W.2d 735 (Wis. Ct. App. 1993). “See sec. 48.297(2), Stats. At a plea hearing, the juvenile must be advised of the allegations in the petition and the nature and possible consequences of the delinquency proceedings.”
Brown Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. T. R. (Wis. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 48.297 but she argues that WIS. STAT. chs.”
In Interest of CAK, 453 N.W.2d 897 (Wis. 1990). “The state maintains that sec. 48.297(2), Stats., provides that objections based on defects in the institution of proceedings under ch.”
Barron Cnty. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. M. S. (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 48.297(1) provides: “Any motion which is capable of determination without trial of the general issue may be made before trial.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.