Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 49.02 (2026)
Relief block grant administration
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
49.02(1)(1) Eligibility for relief block grants. A tribal governing body is eligible to receive a relief block grant if all of the following conditions are met:
49.02(1)(b)(b) The tribal governing body establishes written criteria to be used to determine dependency and reviews these written criteria at least annually.
49.02(1)(c)(c) The tribal governing body submits to the department a plan for the provision of services to be funded by the relief block grant. The plan shall include all of the following:
49.02(1)(c)1.1. How the tribal governing body will determine eligibility and how these eligibility determinations may be appealed. The procedures for determining eligibility and for notice, fair hearing, and review shall be consistent with rules promulgated by the department under sub. (7m).
49.02(1)(c)2.2. How the tribal governing body will determine which health care services are needed by a dependent person.
49.02(1)(c)3.3. The cost containment mechanisms that will be used, including what limitations will be placed on the inappropriate use of emergency room care and what limitations will be placed on payments to providers contracted for under sub. (2).
49.02(1)(d)(d) The department has approved the plan under par. (c). The department shall approve or disapprove the plan within a reasonable period of time after the plan is submitted.
49.02(1e)(1e) Relief agencies. If a tribal governing body is eligible to receive a relief block grant, the tribal governing body shall establish or designate a relief agency to administer relief under this section.
49.02(2)(2) Contracting with private health care providers. A relief agency may use a relief block grant to provide health care services directly or, if the conditions in this subsection are met, by contracting with private health care providers, or by a combination of contracting with private health care providers and providing services directly. A relief agency may contract with a private health care provider to provide health care services under this subsection only if all of the following conditions are met:
49.02(2)(a)(a) The relief agency enters into a contract with the private health care provider to provide specified health care services.
49.02(2)(b)(b) The contract between the relief agency and the private health care provider provides that all records of the health care provider relating to the administration and provision of the health care services shall be open to inspection at all reasonable hours by authorized representatives of the tribal governing body and the department.
49.02(2)(d)(d) The contract limits payment for services under the contract to the amount payable by medical assistance for care for which a medical assistance rate exists.
49.02(2)(e)(e) The contract does not provide for payment for hospitalization or care provided as uncompensated services required under 42 USC 291c.
49.02(2)(f)(f) The contract prohibits the health care provider from holding an individual recipient of health care services funded under this section liable for the difference between the costs of the health care services and the amount paid to the health care provider by the tribal governing body for the services.
49.02(5)(b)(b) A relief agency is not liable for health care services provided to a dependent person if the hospital provides the health care services to the person as uncompensated services required under 42 USC 291c.
49.02(5)(bm)(bm) A relief agency shall limit its liability for health care services funded by a relief block grant to the amount payable by medical assistance under subch. IV for care for which a medical assistance rate exists.
49.02(6g)(6g) Liability of recipients. No individual who receives health care services funded by a relief block grant may be liable for the difference between the costs of the services charged by the health care provider and the amount paid by the relief agency.
49.02(7)(7) Notification requirement. Whenever the department or a relief agency has reason to believe that a person receiving relief is engaging in conduct or behavior prohibited in ch. 944 or ss. 940.225, 948.02, 948.025 or 948.06 to 948.11 the department or relief agency shall promptly notify the law enforcement officials of the county thereof, including facts relating to such person’s alleged misconduct or illegal behavior.
49.02(7m)(7m) Rules. The department shall promulgate rules regarding use of relief block grants. The rules shall include all of the following:
49.02(7m)(b)(b) Procedures for appealing eligibility determinations under s. 49.015. These procedures shall provide for notice, fair hearing and review.
49.02(7m)(c)(c) Procedures that relief agencies shall follow to obtain relief block grants under sub. (1).
49.02(11)(11) Department of transportation records. A relief agency may use vehicle registration information from the department of transportation in determining eligibility for relief.
49.02 HistoryHistory: 1975 c. 184 s. 13; 1981 c. 20, 317; 1983 a. 27 ss. 1005 to 1011, 2202 (20); 1983 a. 205; 1985 a. 29 ss. 936g to 962m, 3200 (23); 1985 a. 120; 1987 a. 18, 27; 1987 a. 332 s. 64; 1989 a. 31, 56, 359; 1991 a. 39, 322; 1993 a. 227, 437; 1995 a. 18, 27; 2007 a. 20; 2009 a. 28.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases, 1933–2003 · leading case: Koller v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 522 N.W.2d 240 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994).
Koller v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 522 N.W.2d 240 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “Because the forms submitted to the County lacked these prerequisites, the County concluded that Koller had not complied with § 49.”
Clark v. Milwaukee Cnty., 524 N.W.2d 382 (Wis. 1994). “The suit alleged two statutory and two constitutional claims: (1) Milwaukee County does not have a written standard of need for housing, as required by § 49.02(lm), Stats. 1 *175 (2) Milwaukee County's shelter policy violates the duty to provide general relief for housing that…”
Clintonville Cmty. Hosp. Ass'n v. City of Clintonville, 275 N.W.2d 655 (Wis. 1979). “Sec. 49.02(1), Stats., provides : “49.02 Relief administration.”
Brown Cnty. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 307 N.W.2d 247 (Wis. 1981). “(A) Eligible dependent persons are entitled to general relief in Wisconsin under one of two basic administrative arrangements: Sec. 49.02(1), Stats., 2 provides that municipalities (towns, cities, or villages) shall provide such *46 relief; and sec.”
St. Michael Hosp. of Franciscan Sisters v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 295 N.W.2d 189 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “1 Section 49.02: (5) The municipality or county shall be liable for the hospitalization of and care rendered by a physician and surgeon to a person entitled to relief under this chapter, without previously authoriz *3 ing the same, when, in the reasonable opinion of a physician,…”
Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 574 N.W.2d 222 (Wis. 1998). “The court of appeals concluded that there was still a question of whether the County adopted standards of need as required by Wis. Stat. § 49.02 (lm) and if so, whether those standards conformed with the applicable common law.”
Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 561 N.W.2d 768 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “(2) The county's failure to establish written standards of need violates sec. 49.02(lm), Stats. *560 (3) The county's failure to engage in a procedure which is designed to determine a reasonable standard of need violates the due process requirements of the federal and state…”
Jones v. Milwaukee Cnty., 485 N.W.2d 21 (Wis. 1992). “Defendant Milwaukee County is a municipal corporation in Wisconsin and is required by sec. 49.02(1m), Stats., to maintain a program that provides general relief to all eligible dependent persons within Milwaukee County.”
Leist v. Shawano Cnty., 91 F.R.D. 64 (E.D. Wis. 1981). “The individual defendants are responsible for the administration of general relief benefits under Wis.Stat. § 49.02. This action is brought under 42 U.”
Luther Hosp. v. Eau Claire Cnty., 339 N.W.2d 798 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). “The notice was intended to satisfy the procedural requisites to county liability for the cost of Gorman’s care under sec. 49.02(5), Stats., 1 and indicated that Gorman was a veteran of United States military service.”
State Ex Rel. Arteaga v. Silverman, 201 N.W.2d 538 (Wis. 1972). “? Eespondents, as officials of the department of public welfare of Milwaukee county, have a statutory duty, pur *115 suant to sec. 49.02, Stats., to furnish relief to all qualified applicants.”
Trinity Mem'l Hosp. of Cudahy, Inc. v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 295 N.W.2d 814 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “Section 49.02 (5), Stats., provides: The municipality or county shall be liable for the hospitalization of and care rendered by a physician and surgeon to a person entitled to relief under this chapter, without previously authorizing the same, when, in the reasonable opinion of…”
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(1) — 5 cases
Brown Cnty. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 307 N.W.2d 247 (Wis. 1981). “(A) Eligible dependent persons are entitled to general relief in Wisconsin under one of two basic administrative arrangements: Sec. 49.02(1), Stats., 2 provides that municipalities (towns, cities, or villages) shall provide such *46 relief; and sec.”
Clintonville Cmty. Hosp. Ass'n v. City of Clintonville, 275 N.W.2d 655 (Wis. 1979). “Sec. 49.02(1), Stats., provides : “49.02 Relief administration.”
City of Madison v. Appeals Comm. of Madison Human Servs. Comm'n, 361 N.W.2d 734 (Wis. Ct. App. 1984).
State Ex Rel. Arteaga v. Silverman, 201 N.W.2d 538 (Wis. 1972). “? Eespondents, as officials of the department of public welfare of Milwaukee county, have a statutory duty, pur *115 suant to sec. 49.02, Stats., to furnish relief to all qualified applicants.”
State Ex Rel. Tiner v. Milwaukee Cnty., 260 N.W.2d 393 (Wis. 1977).
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(1m) — 1 case
Jones v. Milwaukee Cnty., 485 N.W.2d 21 (Wis. 1992). “Defendant Milwaukee County is a municipal corporation in Wisconsin and is required by sec. 49.02(1m), Stats., to maintain a program that provides general relief to all eligible dependent persons within Milwaukee County.”
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(5) — 8 cases
Clintonville Cmty. Hosp. Ass'n v. City of Clintonville, 275 N.W.2d 655 (Wis. 1979). “Sec. 49.02(1), Stats., provides : “49.02 Relief administration.”
St. Michael Hosp. of Franciscan Sisters v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 295 N.W.2d 189 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “1 Section 49.02: (5) The municipality or county shall be liable for the hospitalization of and care rendered by a physician and surgeon to a person entitled to relief under this chapter, without previously authoriz *3 ing the same, when, in the reasonable opinion of a physician,…”
Luther Hosp. v. Eau Claire Cnty., 339 N.W.2d 798 (Wis. Ct. App. 1983). “The notice was intended to satisfy the procedural requisites to county liability for the cost of Gorman’s care under sec. 49.02(5), Stats., 1 and indicated that Gorman was a veteran of United States military service.”
Newkirk v. Wisconsin Dep't of Transp., 598 N.W.2d 610 (Wis. Ct. App. 1999).
Trinity Mem'l Hosp. of Cudahy, Inc. v. Cnty. of Milwaukee, 295 N.W.2d 814 (Wis. Ct. App. 1980). “Section 49.02 (5), Stats., provides: The municipality or county shall be liable for the hospitalization of and care rendered by a physician and surgeon to a person entitled to relief under this chapter, without previously authorizing the same, when, in the reasonable opinion of…”
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(5)(bm) — 1 case
Meriter Hosp., Inc. v. Dane Cnty., 2003 WI App 248 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003).
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(5)(c) — 1 case
Koller v. Pierce Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs., 522 N.W.2d 240 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994). “Because the forms submitted to the County lacked these prerequisites, the County concluded that Koller had not complied with § 49.”
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(9) — 1 case
Hiller v. Adams Cnty., 480 N.W.2d 563 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
— Wis. Stat. § 49.02(lm) — 3 cases
Clark v. Milwaukee Cnty., 524 N.W.2d 382 (Wis. 1994). “The suit alleged two statutory and two constitutional claims: (1) Milwaukee County does not have a written standard of need for housing, as required by § 49.02(lm), Stats. 1 *175 (2) Milwaukee County's shelter policy violates the duty to provide general relief for housing that…”
Hartman v. Winnebago Cnty., 561 N.W.2d 768 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997). “(2) The county's failure to establish written standards of need violates sec. 49.02(lm), Stats. *560 (3) The county's failure to engage in a procedure which is designed to determine a reasonable standard of need violates the due process requirements of the federal and state…”
Hiller v. Adams Cnty., 480 N.W.2d 563 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.