Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 76.075 (2026)

Adjustments of assessments

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
76.07576.075Adjustments of assessments. Within 4 years after the due date, or extended due date, of the report under s. 76.04, any person subject to taxation under this subchapter may request the department to make, or the department may make, an adjustment to the data under s. 76.07 (4g) or (4r) submitted by the person. If an adjustment under this section results in an increase in the tax due under this subchapter, the person shall pay the amount of the tax increase plus interest on that amount at the rate of 1 percent per month from the due date or extended due date of the report under s. 76.04 until the date of final determination and interest at the rate of 1.5 percent per month from the date of final determination until the date of payment. If an adjustment under this section results in a decrease in the tax due under this subchapter, the department shall refund the appropriate amount plus interest at the rate of 0.25 percent per month from the due date or extended due date under s. 76.04 until the date of refund. Sections 71.74 (1) and (2) and 71.75 (6) and (7), as they apply to income and franchise tax adjustments, apply to adjustments under this section. Review of the adjustments is as stated in s. 76.08.
76.075 HistoryHistory: 1989 a. 31; 2021 a. 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2021 · leading case: Sw. Airlines Co. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue, 2021 WI 54 (Wis. 2021).
Sw. Airlines Co. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue, 2021 WI 54 (Wis. 2021). · cites it 5× “First, DOR determined that Wis. Stat. § 76.075 was not the proper mechanism for seeking the hub facility exemption.”
Sw. Airlines Co. v. State of Wisconsin Dep't of Revenue (Wis. Ct. App. 2020). “§ 76.075, to allow for the exemption to be applied.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.