Notes of Decisions
The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz, 2001 WI App 260 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 10× “He refers us to Wis. Stat. § 766.01 (2r)(a), which defines "creditor" as "a person that regularly extends credit" and Matter of Geise, 132 B.”
In Re Marriage of Long v. Long, 539 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 4× “" Section 766.01(10), STATS. While we agree with Roberta that, under this definition, Russell's additional income was "marital property" within the meaning of chapter 766, we disagree with her that a conclusion that income is a marital asset subject to division under § 767.”
Mitchell Bank v. Schanke, 2004 WI 13 (Wis. 2004).
· cites it 2× “…property and all other property of the incurring spouse. The applicable "determination date" here is January 1, 1986. Wis. Stat. § 766.01 (5) (1985-86).”
State v. Ryan M. Muth, 2020 WI 65 (Wis. 2020).
· cites it 2× “" Wis. Stat. § 766.01 (15). Thus, every marital property interest traces back to a property interest.”
In Re Sweitzer, 111 B.R. 792 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1990).
· cites it 5× “" ‘Income’ means wages Wis.Stat. § 766.01(10) (1987). 7 . 11 U.S.”
In Matter of Est. of Lloyd, 487 N.W.2d 644 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 4× “Section 766.01(10), Stats. If tracing proves impossible at any point in an asset's history, the asset is transformed to marital property.”
Marriage of Poindexter v. Poindexter, 419 N.W.2d 223 (Wis. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Under sec. 766.01(5), Stats., the determination date for spouses is the last of the following to occur: 1) the date a Wisconsin couple is married; 2) January 1, 1986, the effective date of the Act; or 3) the date spouses established a marital domicile in Wisconsin.”
Bille v. Zuraff, 543 N.W.2d 568 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 8× “He bases this argument on § 766.01, Stats., which reads: (1) "Acquiring" property includes reducing indebtedness on mcumtered property and obtaining a lien on or security interest in property.”
Patricia Mudlaff v. Joseph McLeod, 2013 WI 76 (Wis. 2013).
· cites it 4× “01(7) defines "dissolution" with reference to "a decree of dissolution, divorce, annulment or declaration of invalidity .”
United States v. Wahlen, 459 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Wis. 2006).
· cites it 2× “Section 766.01(10), Stats. If tracing proves impossible at any point in an asset’s history, the asset is transformed to marital property.”
In Re Sanderfoot, 83 B.R. 564 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Finally, Wisconsin’s enactment of the Marital Property Act, effective January 1, 1986, gave spouses an equal ownership interest in property earned or acquired during the marriage and after the determination date (the date from which the Act applies to a married couple, Wis.Stat.…”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(1) — 1 case
Bille v. Zuraff, 543 N.W.2d 568 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“He bases this argument on § 766.01, Stats., which reads: (1) "Acquiring" property includes reducing indebtedness on mcumtered property and obtaining a lien on or security interest in property.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(10) — 6 cases
In Re Marriage of Long v. Long, 539 N.W.2d 462 (Wis. Ct. App. 1995).
“" Section 766.01(10), STATS. While we agree with Roberta that, under this definition, Russell's additional income was "marital property" within the meaning of chapter 766, we disagree with her that a conclusion that income is a marital asset subject to division under § 767.”
United States v. Wahlen, 459 F. Supp. 2d 800 (E.D. Wis. 2006).
“Section 766.01(10), Stats. If tracing proves impossible at any point in an asset’s history, the asset is transformed to marital property.”
In Matter of Est. of Lloyd, 487 N.W.2d 644 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
“Section 766.01(10), Stats. If tracing proves impossible at any point in an asset's history, the asset is transformed to marital property.”
In Re Sweitzer, 111 B.R. 792 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1990).
“" ‘Income’ means wages Wis.Stat. § 766.01(10) (1987). 7 . 11 U.S.”
The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz, 2001 WI App 260 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
“He refers us to Wis. Stat. § 766.01 (2r)(a), which defines "creditor" as "a person that regularly extends credit" and Matter of Geise, 132 B.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(15) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(2r) — 1 case
The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz, 2001 WI App 260 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
“He refers us to Wis. Stat. § 766.01 (2r)(a), which defines "creditor" as "a person that regularly extends credit" and Matter of Geise, 132 B.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(2r)(a) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(4)(a) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(5) — 14 cases
Marriage of Poindexter v. Poindexter, 419 N.W.2d 223 (Wis. 1988).
“Under sec. 766.01(5), Stats., the determination date for spouses is the last of the following to occur: 1) the date a Wisconsin couple is married; 2) January 1, 1986, the effective date of the Act; or 3) the date spouses established a marital domicile in Wisconsin.”
In Re Sanderfoot, 83 B.R. 564 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 1988).
“Finally, Wisconsin’s enactment of the Marital Property Act, effective January 1, 1986, gave spouses an equal ownership interest in property earned or acquired during the marriage and after the determination date (the date from which the Act applies to a married couple, Wis.Stat.…”
In Matter of Est. of Lloyd, 487 N.W.2d 644 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).
“Section 766.01(10), Stats. If tracing proves impossible at any point in an asset's history, the asset is transformed to marital property.”
In Re Sweitzer, 111 B.R. 792 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1990).
“" ‘Income’ means wages Wis.Stat. § 766.01(10) (1987). 7 . 11 U.S.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(5)(b) — 1 case
In Re Sweitzer, 111 B.R. 792 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 1990).
“" ‘Income’ means wages Wis.Stat. § 766.01(10) (1987). 7 . 11 U.S.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(5)(c) — 2 cases
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(6) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(7) — 1 case
Patricia Mudlaff v. Joseph McLeod, 2013 WI 76 (Wis. 2013).
“01(7) defines "dissolution" with reference to "a decree of dissolution, divorce, annulment or declaration of invalidity .”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(8) — 1 case
— Wis. Stat. § 766.01(9)(a) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.