Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (2026)
Marital property agreements
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
766.58(1)(1) A marital property agreement shall be a document signed by both spouses. Only the spouses may be parties to a marital property agreement. A marital property agreement is enforceable without consideration.
766.58(3)(3) Except as provided in ss. 766.15, 766.55 (4m), 766.57 (3) and 859.18 (6), and in sub. (2), in a marital property agreement spouses may agree with respect to any of the following:
766.58(3)(a)(a) Rights in and obligations with respect to any of either or both spouses’ property whenever and wherever acquired or located.
766.58(3)(c)(c) Disposition of any of either or both spouses’ property upon dissolution or death or upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence of any other event.
766.58(3)(e)(e) Making a will, trust or other arrangement to carry out the marital property agreement.
766.58(3)(f)(f) Providing that upon the death of either spouse any of either or both spouses’ property, including after-acquired property, passes without probate to a designated person, trust or other entity by nontestamentary disposition. Any such provision in a marital property agreement is revoked upon dissolution of the marriage as provided in s. 767.375 (1). If a marital property agreement provides for the nontestamentary disposition of property, without probate, at the death of the 2nd spouse, at any time after the death of the first spouse the surviving spouse may amend the marital property agreement with regard to property to be disposed of at his or her death unless the marital property agreement expressly provides otherwise and except to the extent property is held in a trust expressly established under the marital property agreement.
766.58(3)(h)(h) Any other matter affecting either or both spouses’ property not in violation of public policy or a statute imposing a criminal penalty.
766.58(4)(4) A marital property agreement may be amended or revoked only by a later marital property agreement.
766.58(5)(5) Persons intending to marry each other may enter into a marital property agreement as if married, but the marital property agreement becomes effective only upon their marriage.
766.58(6)(6) A marital property agreement executed before or during marriage is not enforceable if the spouse against whom enforcement is sought proves any of the following:
766.58(6)(c)1.1. Did not receive fair and reasonable disclosure, under the circumstances, of the other spouse’s property or financial obligations; and
766.58(7)(a)(a) Unless the marital property agreement expressly provides otherwise, a marital property agreement that classifies a deferred employment benefit plan or an individual retirement account as marital property does not affect the operation of s. 766.62 (5).
766.58(7)(b)(b) Unless the marital property agreement expressly provides otherwise, marital property agreement that classifies as marital property the noninsured spouse’s interest in a policy that designates the other spouse as the owner and insured does not affect the operation of s. 766.61 (7). In this paragraph, “owner” has the meaning given in s. 766.61 (1) (a) and “policy” has the meaning given in s. 766.61 (1) (c).
766.58(7)(c)(c) Unless the marital property agreement expressly provides otherwise, a marital property agreement that classifies digital property as marital property does not affect the operation of s. 766.625 (2).
766.58(8)(8) The issue of whether a marital property agreement is unconscionable is for the court to decide as a matter of law. In the event that legal counsel is retained in connection with a marital property agreement the fact that both parties are represented by one counsel or that one party is represented by counsel and the other party is not represented by counsel does not by itself make a marital property agreement unconscionable or otherwise affect its enforceability.
766.58(9)(a)(a) Modification or elimination of spousal support during the marriage may not result in a spouse having less than necessary and adequate support, taking into consideration all sources of support.
766.58(9)(b)(b) If a marital property agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support so as to make one spouse eligible for public assistance at the time of dissolution of the marriage or termination of the marriage by death, the court may require the other spouse or the other spouse’s estate to provide support necessary to avoid that eligibility, notwithstanding the marital property agreement.
766.58(10)(10) If the spouses agree in writing to arbitrate any controversies arising under this chapter or a marital property agreement, the arbitration agreement is enforceable under ch. 788.
766.58(11)(11) Married persons or persons intending to marry each other may record a marital property agreement in the county register of deeds office under s. 59.43 (1c) (a).
766.58(12)(a)(a) A provision of a document signed before the determination date by spouses or unmarried persons who subsequently married each other, which provision affects the property of either of them and is enforceable by either of them without reference to this chapter, is not affected by this chapter except as provided otherwise in a marital property agreement made after the determination date.
766.58(12)(b)(b) If a provision or an amendment to a provision in a document described under par. (a) is intended to negate, apply or modify any right or obligation which may be acquired under 1983 Wisconsin Act 186, 1985 Wisconsin Act 37, or a community property system, the provision or amendment is enforceable after the determination date if the document was enforceable when executed or, if it is executed after April 4, 1984, either was enforceable when executed or would be enforceable if it were executed after the determination date.
766.58(12)(c)(c) This subsection does not affect a marital property agreement executed under s. 766.585.
766.58(13)(a)(a) With respect to a provision of a marital property agreement that is effective upon or after dissolution of the marriage or termination of the marriage by death, any statute of limitations applicable to enforcement of the provision is tolled until dissolution of the marriage or termination of the marriage by death, respectively.
766.58(13)(b)1.1. After the death of a spouse, if an estate administration proceeding is filed, no action concerning a marital property agreement may be brought later than 6 months after the inventory is filed under s. 858.01. If an amended inventory is filed, the action may be brought within 6 months after the filing of the amended inventory if the action relates to information contained in the amended inventory that was not contained in a previous inventory.
766.58(13)(b)2.2. After the death of a spouse, if no estate administration proceeding is filed, no action concerning a marital property agreement may be brought later than 8 months after the death of the spouse.
766.58(13)(b)3.3. If an action concerning a marital property agreement is barred under subd. 2. and an estate administration proceeding is thereafter commenced, any judgment in an action concerning a marital property agreement not barred under subd. 1. may be recovered only from the estate of the deceased spouse.
766.58(13)(c)(c) The court may extend the 6-month period under par. (b) 1. for cause if a motion for extension is made within the applicable 6-month period.
766.58(14)(14) Limitations on the effect of marital property agreements for state income tax purposes are set forth in ch. 71.
766.58 HistoryHistory: 1983 a. 186; 1985 a. 37, 403; 1991 a. 301; 1993 a. 160, 213; 1995 a. 201; 1997 a. 188; 2005 a. 443 s. 265; 2015 a. 196; 2023 a. 127; 2025 a. 234.
766.58 NoteNOTE: 1991 Wis. Act 301 contains legislative council notes.
766.58 AnnotationDiscussing whether property agreements are inequitable under s. 767.255 (11) [now s. 767.61 (3) (L)]. Button v. Button, 131 Wis. 2d 84, 388 N.W.2d 546 (1986).
766.58 AnnotationAn annuity that transferred ownership from the owner to a “co-annuitant” on the owner’s death was a joint account under s. 705.04 (1) and a contractual agreement that created a nonprobate transfer under s. 705.20 (1). Both will defeat a marital agreement that does not make the transfer. Reichel v. Jung, 2000 WI App 151, 237 Wis. 2d 853, 616 N.W.2d 118, 99-1211.
766.58 AnnotationSpouses may affirmatively waive the homestead protection in s. 706.02 (1) (f) in a premarital agreement. Jones v. Estate of Jones, 2002 WI 61, 253 Wis. 2d 158, 646 N.W.2d 280, 01-1025.
766.58 AnnotationNo provision of sub. (3) or s. 705.20 permits parties to ignore ch. 854 or to agree to prohibit court involvement in implementing a marital property agreement. That “Washington Will” provisions permit transfer of property without probate does not mean the legislature allowed parties to agree to no court involvement in implementing transfer of ownership and creating a reliable and public record of transfer. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes’ Retirement System Annuity & Pension Board, 2006 WI 10, 288 Wis. 2d 62, 709 N.W.2d 360, 04-1254.
766.58 AnnotationWisconsin’s New Probate Code. Erlanger. Wis. Law. Oct. 1998.
766.58 AnnotationA Decade Post-Button v. Button: Drafting Prenuptial Agreements. Garczynski. Wis. Law. July 1999.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz, 2001 WI App 260 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001).
The Journal Sentinel, Inc. v. Schultz, 2001 WI App 260 (Wis. Ct. App. 2001). “4 A marital property agreement is invalid if it: was not signed by both spouses, Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1); is unconscionable, Wis.”
Devney v. Devney, 886 N.W.2d 61 (Neb. 2016). “§ 20-155 (2008); Wis. Stat. Ann. § 766.58 (West 2009); Epp v.”
Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John Erpelding, 917 N.W.2d 235 (Iowa 2018). “2d 803 , 806 (2004) ; Wisconsin, Wis. Stat. Ann. § 766.58 (3)(d), (9), (12) (West, Westlaw through 2017 Act 136); and Wyoming, see Seherr-Thoss v.”
In Re Marriage of Van Boxtel v. Van Boxtel, 2001 WI 40 (Wis. 2001). “She maintained that the agreement was properly executed under Wis. Stat. § 766.58 and enforceable upon divorce pursuant to § 767.”
Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “In January 1997, Gerald and Agnes, husband and wife, consistent with Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), 2 executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
Hengel v. Hengel, 365 N.W.2d 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “Section 766.58(6) (a), Stats., created by the 1983 Marital Property Act, sec.”
Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2006 WI 10 (Wis. 2006). “In January 1997, Maciolek and her husband, Gerald Maci-olek (Gerald) executed a marital property agreement, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), and created a revocable trust.”
Jones v. Est. of Jones, 2002 WI 61 (Wis. 2002). “§ 766.58(12)(a), however, recognizes that a premarital agreement predating the Act, "is enforceable .”
MacIolek v. Mers, 2006 WI 10 (Wis. 2006). “In January 1997, Maciolek and her husband, Gerald Maciolek (Gerald) executed a marital property agreement, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), and created a revocable trust.”
Maciolek v. Milwaukee Employes'retire. Sys. Annuity, 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 766.58 (1997-98), [2] executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
Czaplewski v. Shepherd, 2012 WI App 116 (Wis. Ct. App. 2012). “A marital property agreement under Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (3)(f) is a "[gjoverning instrument" under Wis.”
Sterling L. North v. Est. of William James North II (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 766.58, which governs marital property agreements, and specifically on § 766.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.58(12)(a) — 1 case
Jones v. Est. of Jones, 2002 WI 61 (Wis. 2002). “§ 766.58(12)(a), however, recognizes that a premarital agreement predating the Act, "is enforceable .”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.58(3) — 2 cases
Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “In January 1997, Gerald and Agnes, husband and wife, consistent with Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), 2 executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
Maciolek v. Milwaukee Employes'retire. Sys. Annuity, 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 766.58 (1997-98), [2] executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.58(3)(f) — 3 cases
Maciolek v. Milwaukee Employes'retire. Sys. Annuity, 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 766.58 (1997-98), [2] executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2006 WI 10 (Wis. 2006). “In January 1997, Maciolek and her husband, Gerald Maci-olek (Gerald) executed a marital property agreement, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), and created a revocable trust.”
MacIolek v. Mers, 2006 WI 10 (Wis. 2006). “In January 1997, Maciolek and her husband, Gerald Maciolek (Gerald) executed a marital property agreement, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), and created a revocable trust.”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.58(3m) — 3 cases
Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Ret. Sys. Annuity & Pension Bd., 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “In January 1997, Gerald and Agnes, husband and wife, consistent with Wis. Stat. § 766.58 (1997-98), 2 executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
Sterling L. North v. Est. of William James North II (Wis. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 766.58, which governs marital property agreements, and specifically on § 766.”
Maciolek v. Milwaukee Employes'retire. Sys. Annuity, 2005 WI App 74 (Wis. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 766.58 (1997-98), [2] executed a Marital Property Agreement ("Agreement").”
— Wis. Stat. § 766.58(6) — 2 cases
Hengel v. Hengel, 365 N.W.2d 16 (Wis. Ct. App. 1985). “Section 766.58(6) (a), Stats., created by the 1983 Marital Property Act, sec.”
Mary Ann Rudie v. Kevin Paul Rudie (Wis. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.