Wisconsin Statutes

Wis. Stat. § 895.447 (2026)

Certain agreements to limit or eliminate tort liability void

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

895.447895.447 Certain agreements to limit or eliminate tort liability void.

895.447(1)(1) Any provision to limit or eliminate tort liability as a part of or in connection with any contract, covenant or agreement relating to the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of a building, structure, or other work related to construction, including any moving, demolition or excavation, is against public policy and void.

895.447(2)(2) This section does not apply to any insurance contract or worker’s compensation plan.

895.447(3)(3) This section shall not apply to any provision of any contract, covenant or agreement entered into prior to July 1, 1978.

895.447 HistoryHistory: 1977 c. 441; Stats. 1977 s. 895.47; 1977 c. 447; Stats. 1977 s. 895.49; 2005 a. 155 s. 49; Stats. 2005 s. 895.447.

895.447 AnnotationThis section did not void an indemnity clause in a contract. Gerdmann v. United States Fire Insurance Co., 119 Wis. 2d 367, 350 N.W.2d 730 (Ct. App. 1984).

895.447 AnnotationThis section did not void a subrogation waiver in a contract because the waiver did not limit or eliminate tort liability. “Tort liability” is the legal obligation or responsibility to another resulting from a civil wrong or injury for which a remedy may be obtained. The subrogation waiver in this case did not limit or eliminate the legal responsibility of the contractors to the property owner for the contractors’ negligent acts. Instead, the subrogation waiver waived the property owner’s right to recover damages from the contractors for their wrongful acts to the extent those damages were covered by a property insurance policy. Collection of damages does not equate with liability. Rural Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lester Buildings, LLC, 2019 WI 70, 387 Wis. 2d 414, 929 N.W.2d 180, 16-1837.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 2017–2019 · leading case: Rural Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lester Bldgs., LLC, 929 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 2019).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rural Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lester Bldgs., LLC, 929 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 2019). · cites it 81× “The circuit court also found that Wis. Stat. § 895.447 did not void that subrogation waiver.”

Rural Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lester Bldgs., LLC (Wis. 2019). · cites it 38× “The circuit court also found that Wis. Stat. § 895.447 did not void that subrogation waiver.”

Wilhelm Constr., Inc. & J.C. Riberger Constr. Corp. v. Secura Ins., a Mut. Co. & Davenport Masoney, Inc. (mem. dec.) (Ind. Ct. App. 2017). “Code § 55-8-14 ; Wis. Stat. § 895.447 . In addition, Louisiana, North Dakota, and Texas have adopted statutes limiting indemnity in certain specific situations.”

— Wis. Stat. § 895.447(2) — 2 cases

Rural Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lester Bldgs., LLC, 929 N.W.2d 180 (Wis. 2019). “The circuit court also found that Wis. Stat. § 895.447 did not void that subrogation waiver.”

Rural Mut. Ins. Co. v. Lester Bldgs., LLC (Wis. 2019). “The circuit court also found that Wis. Stat. § 895.447 did not void that subrogation waiver.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.