Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-106 (2026)

Compensation of cross demands.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When cross demands exist between persons under circumstances
that if one brought an action against the other, a counterclaim
or setoff could be set up, neither can be deprived of the
benefit thereof by assignment by the other, or by his death, but
the two (2) demands will be deemed compensated so far as they
equal each other.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1991–2020 · leading case: Gose v. Hess, 822 P.2d 846 (Wyo. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Gose v. Hess, 822 P.2d 846 (Wyo. 1991). · cites it 8× “COUNTERCLAIM Appellant contends the claimed $3,000 set-off is authorized by Wyo. Stat. § 1-1-106 (1988). It provides: "When cross demands exist between persons under circumstances that if one brought an action against the other, a counterclaim or setoff could be set up, neither…”

Alexander Reed Mantle & Marjorie M. Mantle v. North Star Energy & Constr. Llc Gary W. Garland Raymond W. Garland Matt R. Garland Three Way, Inc. Hot Iron, Inc. Mgm Enter., Inc. Gt Investments, Inc. & Wyodak Energy Servs., Llc, 2020 WY 125 (Wyo. 2020). · cites it 4× “[¶35] The Mantles assert the emphasized part of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-1-106 prohibits partial assignment of judgments: When cross demands exist between persons under circumstances that if one brought an action against the other, a counterclaim or setoff could be set up, neither…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.