Wyo. Stat. » Wyo. Stat. / Title 01 - Civil Procedure / Chapter 28 - INJUNCTIONS / Article 8 - POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN GRANTED
Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 1-28-105 (2026)

Injunction operative from time of notice.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
An injunction shall bind the party from the time he has notice
and the bond required is executed.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 2000–2016 · leading case: Redland v. Redland, 288 P.3d 1173 (Wyo. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Redland v. Redland, 288 P.3d 1173 (Wyo. 2012). · cites it 4× “Specifically, the district court found: that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact of concern to those claims for relief, that Defendant Robert Redland is entitled to judgment as a matter of law with respect to those claims for relief, that the applicable statutes of…”
In Re Est. of Maycock, 2001 WY 103 (Wyo. 2001). · cites it 3× “3 Statute of Frauds [¶ 14] The statute of frauds, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-28-105 (LexisNexis 2001), provides in pertinent part: (a) In the following cases every agreement shall be void unless such agreement, or some note or memorandum thereof, be in writing, and subscribed by the…”
Wendellyn Kay Dane v. Kris Alan Dane, 2016 WY 38 (Wyo. 2016). · cites it 2× “, Apml 2015 update) [125] The same can be said for the prospect that Wife's claim may have been barred by the statute of frauds, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-28-105 (a)(iii) (LexisNexis 2015).”
Comet Energy Servs., LLC v. Powder River Oil & Gas Ventures, LLC, 2010 WY 82 (Wyo. 2010). · cites it 2× “[¶27] The district court held that the 1998 Assignment satisfied the statute of frauds because it was a written agreement to which Forcenergy and Powder River subscribed as required by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-28-105 (LexisNexis 2009).”
Cbm Geosolutions, Inc. v. Gas Sensing Tech. Corp., 2009 WY 113 (Wyo. 2009). · cites it 2× “1942); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-28-105 (1988). Further, the Wyoming Supreme Court has recognized the rule that a covenant not to compete entered into contemporaneously with the employment itself is enforceable and is supported by sufficient consideration.”
Roussalis v. Wyoming Med. Ctr., Inc., 4 P.3d 209 (Wyo. 2000). “Because these alleged modifications to the Letter of Intent were orally made, if at all, and not made in writings signed by WMC, WMC claims they are barred by the statute of frauds.”
Schmid v. Schmid, 2007 WY 148 (Wyo. 2007). · cites it 2× “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-28-105 (a)(i) (LexisNexis 2007).”
Simek v. Tate, 2010 WY 65 (Wyo. 2010). “§ 1-28-105 (Lexis-Nexis 2009) provides in pertinent part as follows: (a) In the following cases every agreement shall be void unless such agreement, or some note or memorandum thereof be in writing, and subscribed by the party to be charged therewith: [[Image here]] *896 (v)…”
Alice A. Platt, 2014 WY 142 (Wyo. 2014). “§ 1-28-105(a)(v) (LexisNexis 2013); Restatement (Third) of Prop.”
Davison v. Wyoming Game & Fish Comm'n, 238 P.3d 556 (Wyo. 2010). · cites it 2× “At oral argument, the [Landowners] argued that the written easement agreement could not be changed by an oral agreement.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 1-28-105(a)(v) — 1 case
Alice A. Platt, 2014 WY 142 (Wyo. 2014). “§ 1-28-105(a)(v) (LexisNexis 2013); Restatement (Third) of Prop.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.