Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-107
Enumeration not exclusive.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The enumeration in W.S. 1-37-103 through 1-37-106 does not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in W.S. 1-37-102 in any proceeding where declaratory relief is sought, in which a judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–2018 · leading case: Washakie County School District Number One v. Herschler
Washakie County School District Number One v. Herschler (1980)
“” § 1-37-107, W.S.1977: “The enumeration in W.”
Britain v. Britain (In re Estate of Britain) (2018)
“§ 1-37-107. [¶ 18] Citing the general rule of statutory construction that specific statutes control over general statutes addressing the same subject when they are in apparent conflict, the district court determined that the specific will contest statute provides the exclusive…”
Shumway v. Worthey (2001)
“§ 1-37-107. Enumeration not exclusive. The enumeration in W.”
Wyoming National Abortion Rights Action League v. Karpan (1994)
“This conclusion is compatible with the policy proclamation found in Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-107, which states that specific enumerations do not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred under the act.”
WYOMING NATIONAL ABORT. RIGHTS LEAGUE v. Karpan (1994)
“§ 1-37-107, which states that specific enumerations do not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred under the act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.