Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-102 (2026)
Scope and general consideration.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Courts of record within their respective jurisdictions may declare rights, status and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed. No proceeding is open to objection on the ground that a declaratory judgment or decree is prayed for. The declaration may be either affirmative or negative in form and effect, and such declarations shall have the effect of a final judgment.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Wyoming Cmty. Coll. Comm'n v. Casper Cmty. Coll. Dist., 2001 WY 86 (Wyo. 2001).
Wyoming Cmty. Coll. Comm'n v. Casper Cmty. Coll. Dist., 2001 WY 86 (Wyo. 2001). “The court's conclusion in Rocky Mountain Oil was based in multiple sources: the plain language of the act ( Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ 1-37-102 and -114); W.”
Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State, 645 P.2d 1163 (Wyo. 1982). “"Courts of record within their respective jurisdictions may declare rights, status and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed.”
Washakie Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. One v. Herschler, 606 P.2d 310 (Wyo. 1980). “1-37-103 through 1-37-106 does not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in W.S. 1-37-102 in any proceeding where declaratory relief is sought, in which a judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty.”
Reiman Corp. v. City of Cheyenne, 838 P.2d 1182 (Wyo. 1992). “Wyo. Stat. § 1-37-102 (1988). Edson R. Sunderland captured the essence of the effect of the declaratory judgment on the administration of justice by explaining that, before the advent of the declaratory judgment, "courts were employed only as repair shops; since that time they…”
Lyle L. Williams v. State of Wyoming ex rel., Univ. of Wyoming Bd. of Trs., 2019 WY 90 (Wyo. 2019). “” Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-102 (LexisNexis 2017).”
Britain v. Britain (In re Est. of Britain), 425 P.3d 978 (Wyo. 2018). “The Act even provides that the enumeration of specific kinds of declarations which can be made is not a limitation on a court's power to render a declaratory judgment relating to other kinds of disputes.”
State Ex Rel. Arnold v. Ommen, 2009 WY 24 (Wyo. 2009). “" Section 1-37-102. Section 1-37-103 provides further: Any person interested under a deed, will, written contract or other writings constituting a contract, or whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by the Wyoming constitution or by a statute, municipal…”
Snake River Brewing Co. v. Town of Jackson, 2002 WY 11 (Wyo. 2002). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-102 (LexisNexis 2001).”
Campbell Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Catchpole, 6 P.3d 1275 (Wyo. 2000). “The basis for such a conclusion was found in the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, specifically Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-102 and -114 (Lexis 1999), 5 and in W.”
Voss v. Goodman, 2009 WY 40 (Wyo. 2009). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-37-102 (LexisNexis 2007).”
Shumway v. Worthey, 2001 WY 130 (Wyo. 2001). “1-37-103 through 1-37-106 does not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in W.S. 1-37-102 in any proceeding where declaratory relief is sought, in which a judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty.”
In Re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River, 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo. 1988). “Section 1-37-102, W.S. 1977, provides that "such declarations shall have the effect of a final judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.