Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 14-2-312 (2026)
Hearing; appointment of guardian ad litem.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
After the petition has been filed, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child unless the court finds the interests of the child will be represented adequately by the petitioner or another party to the action and are not adverse to that party. If the court appoints a guardian ad litem it shall approve a fee for services. When a petition is filed and presented to the judge, the judge shall set the petition for hearing. The Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure, including the right of a parent, child or interested person to demand a jury trial, are applicable in actions brought under this act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 25
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: In Re Mn, 2007 WY 189 (Wyo. 2007).
In Re Mn, 2007 WY 189 (Wyo. 2007). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 requires in pertinent part as follows: After the petition has been filed, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child unless the court finds the interests of the child will be represented adequately by the petitioner or another…”
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: GAC, a Minor Child. Krystal Kaylynn Cave v. State of Wyoming, Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2017 WY 65 (Wyo. 2017). “§ 14-2-312 (LexisNexis 2015) states in relevant part: After the petition [to terminate parental rights] has been filed, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child unless the court finds the interests of the child will be represented adequately by the…”
Matter of Adoption of JLP, 774 P.2d 624 (Wyo. 1989). “NOTES [1] The right to a jury trial in a termination proceeding is provided by Wyo. Stat. § 14-2-312 (1977). [2] Appellant does not raise as an issue on appeal the denial of his demand for a jury trial, although he does mention it in connection with his argument regarding the…”
In Re Zmets, 2012 WY 68 (Wyo. 2012). “After default had been entered, in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 , the district court scheduled the matter for hearing.”
Dane Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Mable K., 2013 WI 28 (Wis. 2013). “10A, § 1-4-502 (West 2012); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 (West 2012); Va.”
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to: NRAE, a minor child, Cody John Niland v. State of Wyoming, ex rel. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2020 WY 121 (Wyo. 2020). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 (LexisNexis 2019) (“When a [termination] petition is filed and presented to the judge, the judge shall set the petition for hearing.”
LP v. Natrona Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Assistance & Soc. Servs., 679 P.2d 976 (Wyo. 1984). “Section 14-2-312, W.S. 1977, 1983 Cum.Supp.”
KC v. State, 351 P.3d 236 (Wyo. 2015). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 through 14-2-815.”
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights To: Tjh, Minor Child, Christine Dawn Herden v. State of Wyoming, Ex Rel. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2021 WY 56 (Wyo. 2021). “3d at 395 (citing Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 (“When a petition is filed and presented to the judge, the judge shall set the petition for hearing.”
PL v. Johnson Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Assistance & Soc. Servs., 761 P.2d 985 (Wyo. 1988). “14-2-312 provides, with respect to termination proceedings, that: After the petition has been filed, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the child unless the court finds the interests of the child will be represented adequately by the petitioner or another…”
WR v. Natrona Cnty. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 916 P.2d 991 (Wyo. 1996). “” In making this assertion, WR relies upon the mandates found in Wyo.Stat. § 14-2-312 (1986) and Wyo.Unif.”
In the Matter of the Termination of Parental Rights to: LCB, minor child, Sheena Marie Gipson v. State of Wyoming, ex rel. Dep't of Fam. Servs., 2023 WY 23 (Wyo. 2023). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-312 . 4 The district court’s order denying a jury trial pursuant to Rule 39 did not affect Mother’s parental rights or deprive her of due process and cannot be construed to have affected a substantial right.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.