Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 14-2-316 (2026)
Dismissal of petition; continuation of hearing.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If the court does not terminate the parent-child legal relationship, it shall dismiss the petition or direct an authorized agency to continue to make efforts to rehabilitate the parent and continue the hearing for no longer than six (6) months. The authorized agency shall provide the court with any additional reports regarding its rehabilitative efforts and results. Pending final hearing, the court may continue the present placement of the child or place the child in the temporary custody of an authorized agency and fix responsibility for temporary child support.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1982–2007 · leading case: Seg v. Gdk, 2007 WY 203 (Wyo. 2007).
Seg v. Gdk, 2007 WY 203 (Wyo. 2007). “] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-316 (LexisNexis 2007).”
In Re Ad, 2007 WY 23 (Wyo. 2007). “Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-316 (LexisNexis 2005), [2] the district court continued the hearing for six months and ordered DFS to retain custody of the children but make additional efforts to rehabilitate Mother.”
In Interest of JG, 742 P.2d 770 (Wyo. 1987). “Whether the district court erred in failing to continue the petition pursuant to W.S. 14-2-316. “IV. Whether W.S. 14-2-309(iv) is unconstitutionally vague.”
C.L. v. Wyoming Dep't of Fam. Servs., 151 P.3d 1102 (Wyo. 2007). “Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-2-316 (LexisNexis 2005), 2 the district court continued the hearing for six months and ordered DFS to retain custody of the children but make additional efforts to rehabilitate Mother.”
CP v. Laramie Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Assistance & Soc. Servs., 648 P.2d 512 (Wyo. 1982). “1981 [sic] [§ 14-2-316, W.S.1977, Cum.Supp. 1981], as a reasonable and lesser intrusion upon a fundamental liberty.”
Matter of Parental Rights of PP, 648 P.2d 512 (Wyo. 1982). “1981 [sic] [§ 14-2-316, W.S. 1977, Cum.Supp. 1981], as a reasonable and lesser intrusion upon a fundamental liberty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.