Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223 (2026)
Privilege against self-incrimination; rights of
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
parties generally; demand for and conduct of jury trial.
(a) A child alleged to be delinquent may remain silent and
need not be a witness against or otherwise incriminate himself,
whether before the court voluntarily, by subpoena or otherwise.
(b) A party to any proceeding under this act is entitled
to:
(i) A copy of all charges made against him;
(ii) Confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses;
(iii) Introduce evidence, present witnesses and
otherwise be heard in his own behalf; and
(iv) Issue of process by the court to compel the
appearance of witnesses or the production of evidence.
(c) A party against whom a petition has been filed or the
district attorney may demand a trial by jury at an adjudicatory
hearing. The jury shall be composed of jurors selected,
qualified and compensated as provided by law for the trial of
civil matters in the district court. The jury may also be
selected from the prospective jurors on the base jury list
residing within five (5) miles of the city or town where the
trial is to be held, whichever the court directs. Demand for a
jury trial must be made to the court not later than ten (10)
days after the party making the demand is advised of his right
to a jury trial. No deposit for jury fees is required. Failure
of a party to demand a jury is a waiver of this right.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: Matter of ALJ, 836 P.2d 307 (Wyo. 1992).
Matter of ALJ, 836 P.2d 307 (Wyo. 1992). “" Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223(a). Specific issues inculcated into the majority decision which remain undiscussed in the opinion include: (1) a basic discrimination based on age in punishment against a minor in severity of sentence (when he is prosecuted as a minor instead of charged…”
Sam v. State, 401 P.3d 834 (Wyo. 2017). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2017).”
In the Interest Of: Jp v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 94 (Wyo. 2022). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (c) (LexisNexis 2021).”
Alex Jordan Vaughn v. State, 2017 WY 29 (Wyo. 2017). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (c). 4 . See, e.”
Hansen v. State, 904 P.2d 811 (Wyo. 1995). “****** Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223: (a) A child alleged to be delinquent may remain silent and need not be a witness against or otherwise incriminate himself, whether before the court voluntarily, by subpoena or otherwise'.”
Robert Charles Rosen v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 16 (Wyo. 2022). “§ 14-6-220 authorizes the juvenile court to order emergency medical, surgical, or dental examination of a “child” for purposes of treatment or evidence preservation; • Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (a) provides that a “child alleged to be delinquent may remain silent and need not…”
State Ex Rel. C v. Platte Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Assistance & Soc. Servs., 638 P.2d 165 (Wyo. 1981). “14-6-222; “(iii) The child’s right to remain silent with respect to any allegations of a delinquent act; “(iv) The right to confront and cross-examine witnesses or to present witnesses in their own behalf; “(v) The right to a jury trial as provided in W.S. 14-6-223; “(vi) The…”
State ex rel. D.J., 817 So. 2d 26 (La. 2002). “31(2) (West 1987); Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(c) (1994); Ill.Ann.”
In Interest of Blm, 902 P.2d 1288 (Wyo. 1995). “Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223(b) (1981). One of the most basic elements of due process is the right of each party to be apprised of all the evidence upon which an issue is to be decided, with the right to examine, explain or rebut such evidence.”
KC v. State, 2011 WY 108 (Wyo. 2011). “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (LexisNexis 2011).”
In the Interest of K.C. v. State, 257 P.3d 23 (Wyo. 2011). “See Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (LexisNexis 2011).”
State ex rel. A.J., 27 So. 3d 247 (La. 2009). “Code § 49-5-6; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (c); RLR v. State, 487 P.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(a) — 1 case
Matter of ALJ, 836 P.2d 307 (Wyo. 1992). “" Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223(a). Specific issues inculcated into the majority decision which remain undiscussed in the opinion include: (1) a basic discrimination based on age in punishment against a minor in severity of sentence (when he is prosecuted as a minor instead of charged…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(b) — 1 case
In Interest of Blm, 902 P.2d 1288 (Wyo. 1995). “Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223(b) (1981). One of the most basic elements of due process is the right of each party to be apprised of all the evidence upon which an issue is to be decided, with the right to examine, explain or rebut such evidence.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(b)(ii) — 1 case
Sam v. State, 401 P.3d 834 (Wyo. 2017). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (b)(ii) (LexisNexis 2017).”
— Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(c) — 4 cases
Matter of ALJ, 836 P.2d 307 (Wyo. 1992). “" Wyo.Stat. § 14-6-223(a). Specific issues inculcated into the majority decision which remain undiscussed in the opinion include: (1) a basic discrimination based on age in punishment against a minor in severity of sentence (when he is prosecuted as a minor instead of charged…”
In the Interest Of: Jp v. The State of Wyoming, 2022 WY 94 (Wyo. 2022). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-223 (c) (LexisNexis 2021).”
State ex rel. D.J., 817 So. 2d 26 (La. 2002). “31(2) (West 1987); Wyo. Stat. § 14-6-223(c) (1994); Ill.Ann.”
State Ex Rel. Dj, 817 So. 2d 26 (La. 2002).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.