Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 17-4-101 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This act may be cited as the "Wyoming Uniform Securities Act."
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: Dickson v. State, 903 P.2d 1019 (Wyo. 1995).
Dickson v. State, 903 P.2d 1019 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 4× “Wyo.Stat. § 17-4-101 (1989) provides, in pertinent part: (a) It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (i) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (ii) To make any untrue statement of a…”
Gaudina v. Haberman, 644 P.2d 159 (Wyo. 1982). · cites it 3× “1 now § 17-4-101, W.S.; § 17.117.3 now [§] 17-4-103; and § 17.”
State ex rel. State Treasurer v. Moody's Investors Serv., Inc., 349 P.3d 979 (Wyo. 2015). · cites it 4× “Whether the district court committed error as a matter of law by granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss the Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated the Wyoming state securities statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 17-4-101 , et seq. Appellees present a single issue on appeal: Whether…”
Christensen v. State, 854 P.2d 675 (Wyo. 1993). · cites it 2× “On September 16, 1985, Christensen was charged and pled not guilty to twenty-five violations of security laws under Wyo.Stat. § 17-4-101(a) and 17-4-107(a) (1977).”
Shepperd v. Boettcher & Co., Inc., 756 P.2d 182 (Wyo. 1988). · cites it 8× “By certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, this court determines as a question of Wyoming law: "Does the sale of an undivided one-and-two-thirds per cent working interest in an oil and gas lease constitute a `security' as defined by the…”
Bath v. Bushkin, Gaims, Gaines & Jonas, 695 F. Supp. 1156 (D. Wyo. 1988). · cites it 2× “See Wyo.Stat. §§ 17-4-101 to 17-4-130 (1987).”
Shepperd v. Boettcher & Co., Inc., 613 F. Supp. 287 (D. Wyo. 1985). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs allege that the working interests are “securities” and “investment contracts” within the meaning of the Wyoming Uniform Securities Act, Wyo.Stat. § 17-4-101 et seq. (1977), et seq.”
Ravenswood Inv. Co. v. Bishop Capital Corp., 374 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (D. Wyo. 2005). · cites it 6× “endants violated § 17-4-101, which provides: (a) It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (i) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (ii) To make any untrue statement of a material fact…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 17-4-101(a) — 1 case
Christensen v. State, 854 P.2d 675 (Wyo. 1993). “On September 16, 1985, Christensen was charged and pled not guilty to twenty-five violations of security laws under Wyo.Stat. § 17-4-101(a) and 17-4-107(a) (1977).”
— Wyo. Stat. § 17-4-101(a)(ii) — 1 case
Dickson v. State, 903 P.2d 1019 (Wyo. 1995). “Wyo.Stat. § 17-4-101 (1989) provides, in pertinent part: (a) It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (i) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (ii) To make any untrue statement of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.