Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 22-21-107 (2026)
Contests; procedure.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any five (5) qualified electors of the political subdivision may contest an election on the question of the creation of an indebtedness upon filing in the district court of any county in which the political subdivision is wholly or partially located, within fourteen (14) days after the result of the election shall have been determined, a petition alleging an error that would change the result of the election, in like form as in other cases of contested elections in the district court. The political subdivision shall be made defendant, and process shall be served upon the clerk of the governing body or other chief clerical officer as in other civil actions. No civil action contesting the results of such an election or alleging election errors may be commenced after the expiration of such fourteen (14) day period.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1981–2012 · leading case: Snell v. Johnson Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 86 P.3d 248 (Wyo. 2004).
Snell v. Johnson Cnty. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 86 P.3d 248 (Wyo. 2004). “No one filed a contest of the election within fourteen (14) days as allowed by Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 22-21-107 (Lex-isNexis 2003).”
Hyatt v. Big Horn Sch. Dist. No. 4, 636 P.2d 525 (Wyo. 1981). “” Section 22-21-107, W.S.1977 provides in pertinent part: “Any five (5) qualified electors of the political subdivision may contest an election on the question of the creation of an indebtedness upon filing in the district court of any county in which the political subdivision…”
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration Network, 299 P.3d 990 (Utah 2012). “, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 22-21-107 (2012) (allowing "[aluy five (5) qualified electors of [a] political subdivision" to "contest an election on the question of the creation of an indebtedness" but only if the suit is filed "within fourteen (14) days after the result of the election…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.