Wyoming Statutes

Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-306 (2026)

Extraterritorial applicability of provisions;

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WY-LEGwyoleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

reciprocity.

    (a)   Repealed By Laws 1997, ch. 177, § 2.

     (b) A certificate from an authorized officer of the
worker's compensation department or similar agency of another
state certifying that an employer of that state is bound by the
worker's compensation or similar law of that state and the law
will be applied to employees of the employer while in this
state, is prima facie evidence of the application of the
worker's compensation or similar law of the certifying state.
This subsection shall apply only when the certifying state
accepts Wyoming worker's compensation certification as prima
facie evidence of the application of Wyoming worker's
compensation or similar law or when the certifying state and
Wyoming have an active agreement under subsection (d) of this
section.

     (c) The benefits under this act or similar laws of the
other state that are received by the employee for an injury
sustained while working for the employer in this state are the
exclusive remedy against the employer and coemployees acting
within the scope of their employment for an injury whether or
not that injury resulted in death.

     (d) Upon approval of the governor, the division shall
enter into an agreement with any worker's compensation division
or similar agency of another state to promulgate regulations not
inconsistent with this act to carry out the extraterritorial
application of the worker's compensation or similar law of the
agreeing state.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2016 · leading case: State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Dep't of Workforce Servs., Workers' Comp. Div. v. Cody Beazer & Horsley Co., LLC, 2016 WY 111 (Wyo. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State of Wyoming, ex rel., Wyoming Dep't of Workforce Servs., Workers' Comp. Div. v. Cody Beazer & Horsley Co., LLC, 2016 WY 111 (Wyo. 2016). · cites it 4× “Having found then that there are no issues of fact with regard to the Employ *272 er’s compliance with Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-306, the Office further finds and concludes that the Employer is relieved from obligation to report and pay premiums to the Division as set forth in Article…”

Worker's Comp. Claim of Gneiting v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 897 P.2d 1306 (Wyo. 1995). · cites it 2× “” In its final determinations, the Workers’ Compensation Division stated that Gneiting was not entitled to be awarded worker’s compensation benefits because he was not a Wyoming resident and because he was not permanently assigned to Wyoming pursuant to Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-306(a)…”

— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-306(a) — 1 case

Worker's Comp. Claim of Gneiting v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 897 P.2d 1306 (Wyo. 1995). “” In its final determinations, the Workers’ Compensation Division stated that Gneiting was not entitled to be awarded worker’s compensation benefits because he was not a Wyoming resident and because he was not permanently assigned to Wyoming pursuant to Wyo.Stat. § 27-14-306(a)…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.