Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608 (2026)
Attorney fees; penalty for violation.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) If the hearing examiner under W.S. 27-14-602(d) or the district court or supreme court under W.S. 27-14-615 set a fee for any person for representing a claimant under this act excluding a health care provider, the person shall not receive any additional fee from the claimant. (b) Any person violating this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00), imprisonment in the county jail for a term not to exceed six (6) months, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1991–2015 · leading case: Worker's Comp. Claim of Bruns v. TW Servs., Inc., 2001 WY 127 (Wyo. 2001).
Worker's Comp. Claim of Bruns v. TW Servs., Inc., 2001 WY 127 (Wyo. 2001). “On appeal, the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) denied the claim on two grounds: (1) the claimant failed to establish his heart condition met the statutory requirements of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (b) (LexisNexis 2001), 2 and (2) the claimant failed to establish a…”
Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 128 (Wyo. 2010). “Ball suffered the hernia when a spinal cord stimulator, implanted to treat chronic back pain from an earlier compensa-ble work-related injury, malfunctioned and shocked him, causing him to stand rapidly and then fall, The question we must answer is whether the hernia occurred…”
Worker's Comp. Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2002 WY 91 (Wyo. 2002). “§ 27-14-102(a)(xi) (LexisNexis 2001) and an injury which occurred over a substantial period of time pursuant to § 27-14-608(a). In reaching this determination, the hearing examiner found Ms.”
Carabajal v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 119 P.3d 947 (Wyo. 2005). “Due to the perceived lack of a work-related triggering event for the 1997 injury, the hearing examiner applied the burden of proof set forth in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (a) regarding injuries which develop over a substantial period of time.”
State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div. v. Brown, 805 P.2d 830 (Wyo. 1991). “W.S. 27-14-608 (1987). This section was also restated in 1989 by amendment obviously intended to delete the supervision of fees charged by the health care provider by stating: (a) If the hearing examiner under W.”
Serda v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2002 WY 38 (Wyo. 2002). “[2] We include here Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (LexisNexis 2001), which prohibits an attorney from receiving an additional fee from a claimant.”
KG Constr., Inc. v. Sherman, 2005 WY 116 (Wyo. 2005). “[117] Section 27-14-608(a) establishes five separate elements a claimant must prove to establish an injury occurring over a substantial period of time.”
Horn-Dalton v. State, 2009 WY 14 (Wyo. 2009). “This testimony supports the conclusion that Appellant's injury occurred over a substantial period of time and is subject to the heightened burden of proof of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (a) (LexisNexis 2007), which states as follows: (a) The burden of proof in contested cases…”
State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div. v. Garl, 2001 WY 59 (Wyo. 2001). “§ 27-14-608(a) (LEXIS 1999) reads: (a) The burden of proof in contested cases involving injuries which occur over a substantial period of time is on the employee to prove by competent medical authority that his claim arose out of and in the course of his employment and to prove…”
Frontier Refining, Inc. v. Payne, 2001 WY 49 (Wyo. 2001). “*41 [¶10] Because Payne claimed that his CTS occurred over a substantial period of time, the hearing examiner applied Wyo.Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608(a)(1) through (v) (Lexis 1999): Burden of proof; required proof of circumstances; coronary conditions; hernia.”
Chavez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 204 P.3d 967 (Wyo. 2009). “Chavez relies on, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (3), explicitly requires a claimant to prove that the injury occurring over time was caused by the conditions of his work.”
Harris v. Sinclair Trucking, 900 P.2d 1163 (Wyo. 1995). “Whether the administrative conclusion that Sherman Harris’ heart attack was not compensable under the standards of W.S. § 27-14-608 is supported by substantial evidence, in accordance with law and not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of discretion.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(0) — 1 case
Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 128 (Wyo. 2010). “Ball suffered the hernia when a spinal cord stimulator, implanted to treat chronic back pain from an earlier compensa-ble work-related injury, malfunctioned and shocked him, causing him to stand rapidly and then fall, The question we must answer is whether the hernia occurred…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(a) — 5 cases
Worker's Comp. Claim of Newman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2002 WY 91 (Wyo. 2002). “§ 27-14-102(a)(xi) (LexisNexis 2001) and an injury which occurred over a substantial period of time pursuant to § 27-14-608(a). In reaching this determination, the hearing examiner found Ms.”
KG Constr., Inc. v. Sherman, 2005 WY 116 (Wyo. 2005). “[117] Section 27-14-608(a) establishes five separate elements a claimant must prove to establish an injury occurring over a substantial period of time.”
State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div. v. Garl, 2001 WY 59 (Wyo. 2001). “§ 27-14-608(a) (LEXIS 1999) reads: (a) The burden of proof in contested cases involving injuries which occur over a substantial period of time is on the employee to prove by competent medical authority that his claim arose out of and in the course of his employment and to prove…”
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 166 (Wyo. 2010).
Robinson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2009 WY 47 (Wyo. 2009).
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(a)(1) — 1 case
Frontier Refining, Inc. v. Payne, 2001 WY 49 (Wyo. 2001). “*41 [¶10] Because Payne claimed that his CTS occurred over a substantial period of time, the hearing examiner applied Wyo.Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608(a)(1) through (v) (Lexis 1999): Burden of proof; required proof of circumstances; coronary conditions; hernia.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(b) — 2 cases
Worker's Comp. Claim of Bruns v. TW Servs., Inc., 2001 WY 127 (Wyo. 2001). “On appeal, the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) denied the claim on two grounds: (1) the claimant failed to establish his heart condition met the statutory requirements of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 27-14-608 (b) (LexisNexis 2001), 2 and (2) the claimant failed to establish a…”
Sheth v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Comp. Div., 11 P.3d 375 (Wyo. 2000).
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(b)(f) — 1 case
Scherf v. State ex rel. Dep't of Workforce Servs., 360 P.3d 66 (Wyo. 2015).
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(b)(ii) — 1 case
In the Matter of the Worker's Comp. Claim of: Anita J. Fieseler v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2013 WY 116 (Wyo. 2013).
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(c) — 1 case
Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 128 (Wyo. 2010). “Ball suffered the hernia when a spinal cord stimulator, implanted to treat chronic back pain from an earlier compensa-ble work-related injury, malfunctioned and shocked him, causing him to stand rapidly and then fall, The question we must answer is whether the hernia occurred…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(c)(ifi) — 1 case
Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 128 (Wyo. 2010). “Ball suffered the hernia when a spinal cord stimulator, implanted to treat chronic back pain from an earlier compensa-ble work-related injury, malfunctioned and shocked him, causing him to stand rapidly and then fall, The question we must answer is whether the hernia occurred…”
— Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-608(c)(iii) — 1 case
Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Saf. & Comp. Div., 2010 WY 128 (Wyo. 2010). “Ball suffered the hernia when a spinal cord stimulator, implanted to treat chronic back pain from an earlier compensa-ble work-related injury, malfunctioned and shocked him, causing him to stand rapidly and then fall, The question we must answer is whether the hernia occurred…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.