Wyoming Statutes
Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103 (2026)
Review of death sentences; notice from clerk of
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WY-LEGwyoleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
trial court; factors to be considered by supreme court;
disposition of appeal.
(a) The judgment of conviction and sentence of death is
subject to automatic review by the supreme court of Wyoming
within one hundred twenty (120) days after certification by the
sentencing court of the entire record, unless the time is
extended for an additional period not to exceed sixty (60) days
by the supreme court for good cause shown. Such review by the
supreme court shall have priority over all other cases.
(b) Within ten (10) days after receiving the transcript,
the clerk of the trial court shall transmit the entire record
and transcript to the supreme court of Wyoming together with a
notice prepared by the clerk and a report prepared by the trial
judge. The notice shall set forth the title and docket number of
the case, the name of the defendant and the name and address of
his attorney, a statement of the judgment, the crime and
punishment prescribed. The report shall be in the form of a
standard questionnaire prepared and supplied by the supreme
court of Wyoming.
(c) The supreme court of Wyoming shall consider the
punishment as well as any errors enumerated by way of appeal.
(d) With regard to the sentence, the court shall determine
if:
(i) The sentence of death was imposed under the
influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor;
(ii) The evidence supports the jury's or judge's
finding of an aggravating circumstance as enumerated in W.S.
6-2-102 and mitigating circumstances.
(iii) Repealed by Laws 1989, ch. 171, § 2.
(e) In addition to its authority regarding correction of
errors, the court, with regard to review of death sentences,
may:
(i) Affirm the sentence of death;
(ii) Set the sentence aside and impose a sentence of
life imprisonment without parole, or life imprisonment; or
(iii) Set the sentence aside and remand the case for
resentencing.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1984–2018 · leading case: State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651 (Tenn. 1997).
State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651 (Tenn. 1997). “9711(h); South Carolina, S.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-25 (C); South Dakota, S.”
Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990). “100 (1989); Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103 (1988). Ohio's rule as to waiver is unclear.”
Davis v. State, 415 P.3d 666 (Wyo. 2018). “Capital sentences are subject to review in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (LexisNexis 2017).”
Harlow v. State, 2003 WY 47 (Wyo. 2003). “[T1] In accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (Michie 1997), this is an appeal from convictions of capital murder charged under Wyo.”
Harlow v. State, 2005 WY 12 (Wyo. 2005). “Were Harlow’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection violated by the untimely disposition of his appeal? [¶73] Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (a) (Lexis 1999) provides for automatic review of capital sentences: The judgment of conviction and…”
Engberg v. State, 686 P.2d 541 (Wyo. 1984). “Section 6-2-103, W.S. 1977. Therefore, under the plain-error rule and statutory directive, this court is bound to examine all aggravating-circumstance considerations to determine whether they supplied a constitutionally permissible basis for imposition of the death penalty.”
Olsen v. State, 67 P.3d 536 (Wyo. 2003). “Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (d)G) and () (Michie 1997).”
State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. Dist. Court, Teton Cnty., 696 P.2d 54 (Wyo. 1985). “Section 6-2-103, W.S. That we have done, and we see nothing new in what has been offered which requires us to do it again.”
Hopkinson v. State, 798 P.2d 1186 (Wyo. 1990). “The court may either affirm the sentence of the death, set the sentence aside and impose a sentence of life imprisonment, or set the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing.”
Osborn v. State, 806 P.2d 259 (Wyo. 1991). “W.S. 6-2-103(a), this case is considered within the present proper perspective of a multiple murder life sentence criminal case where involvement and participation of Osborn is not in any issue.”
Osborn v. Schillinger, 639 F. Supp. 610 (D. Wyo. 1986). “Wyo.Stat. § 6-2-103 (1938). See Gardner v.”
Engberg v. Meyer, 820 P.2d 70 (Wyo. 1991). “It may be that the majority intended to invoke the language of § 6-2-103(e)(iii), W.S. 1977 (Cum.Supp. 1991), which provides that this court may "[s]et the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(a) — 1 case
Osborn v. State, 806 P.2d 259 (Wyo. 1991). “W.S. 6-2-103(a), this case is considered within the present proper perspective of a multiple murder life sentence criminal case where involvement and participation of Osborn is not in any issue.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(b) — 1 case
Hopkinson v. State, 679 P.2d 1008 (Wyo. 1984).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(c) — 1 case
Harlow v. State, 2003 WY 47 (Wyo. 2003). “[T1] In accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (Michie 1997), this is an appeal from convictions of capital murder charged under Wyo.”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(d) — 1 case
Davis v. State, 415 P.3d 666 (Wyo. 2018). “Capital sentences are subject to review in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-103 (LexisNexis 2017).”
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(e) — 2 cases
Hopkinson v. State, 798 P.2d 1186 (Wyo. 1990). “The court may either affirm the sentence of the death, set the sentence aside and impose a sentence of life imprisonment, or set the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing.”
Hopkinson v. State, 704 P.2d 1323 (Wyo. 1985).
— Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-103(e)(iii) — 1 case
Engberg v. Meyer, 820 P.2d 70 (Wyo. 1991). “It may be that the majority intended to invoke the language of § 6-2-103(e)(iii), W.S. 1977 (Cum.Supp. 1991), which provides that this court may "[s]et the sentence aside and remand the case for resentencing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.